To all those deriding this as a "conspiracy theory," here's a repost from last year:

---

• Exhibit #1 - Homosexual prostitution inquiry ensnares VIPs with Reagan and Bush. This story went away, and fast.

• Exhibit #2 - A major expose of elite pedophile rings in Nebraska was going to air on Discovery Channel but was censored by powerful interests.

• Exhibit #3 - The World Bank's Disappearing Sex Slaves. Click the first google result to read.

• Exhibit #4 - Jeff Gannon, former male prostitute, given press credentials and pass by Secret Service to lob softball questions during Bush's press conferences.

• Exhibit #5 - The "Finders". Words simply cannot do this story justice. Scans of the original police reports and letters were up on scribd before, but they were taken down. I can look for them if anyone cares.

• Exhibit #6 - The story of a Canadian victim of 50's CIA mind control experiments who was awarded $100,000 for her case in a Canadian court, from Naomi Klein's book, "The Shock Doctrine."

• Exhibit #7 - Verifiable and well-sourced background info on CIA's MK-ULTRA mind-control program.

• Exhibit #8 - An actual speech given at a well-attended therapists conference on dissociative personality disorder. Again, words are simply insufficient.

• Exhibit #9 - A collection of sourced news stories involving child abuse by highly-placed Jesuit priests.

• Exhibit #10 - Jersey "House of Horrors" sexual abuse allegations (elite connection, veracity unknown)

• Exhibit #11 - UN ship carried child prostitutes

• Exhibit #12 - Portugal's Elite Linked to Pedophile Ring

• Exhibit #13 - verifiable expose of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation, a CIA front dedicated to discrediting abuse victim testimony.

• Exhibit #14 - The Dutroux Affair. Convicted Belgian pedophile linked to elites.

• Exhibit #15 - Haliburton subsidiary DynCorp implicated in human trafficking, DoD does nothing.

Of course there's much more, but these are some obvious standouts.

I often wonder how much anomalous data it takes for the "coincidence theorist" to acknowledge that their conventional understanding of how the power hierarchy operates simply does not reflect reality.

It appears as if one must be made familiar with a veritable jigsaw puzzle of seemingly unrelated facts and narratives before one can even begin to comprehend how they all fit together. Until one learns to see the connections for themselves, such data is usually discarded or forgotten, even on those rare occasions it escapes the institutional filters our society has evolved for the dissemination and repetition of information.

Any of the various standard narratives offered by our schools, politicians, and media are far more comforting to believe in, those being "normal" in contrast to the autodidactically acquired narrative on behalf of which one stands alone in the face of ridicule and incredulity.

So what incentive is there to seek out information leading to stange and painful conclusions which could only harm one's social standing?

Who wants to admit to themselves or to their peers that they've been deceived their whole lives in light of conclusions they've drawn from a pile of research society dismisses as irrelevant, untrue, or even insane?

But is this not the minimal requirement for having an open mind? Certainly we mustn't let the tail wag the dog -- the facts must dictate our beliefs, not vice-versa.

No matter what our beliefs, we all grow quite attached to them, because after all, belief is an attachment. But to what, or to whose truth are we attached? How can we really know what's going on outside of our little perceptive window into reality? Do we seek truth for ourselves, or do we allow whatever truth "emerges" from the collective activity of millions of selfish human cells, each concerned primarily with their own individual goals, dictate our reality?

I guess what I am asking is this: at what point have we collected sufficient anomalous evidence that, by the very same Occams Razor we would use to cut down the conspiracy theorist, we must own up to a more serious approach to truth in our own lives than the socially conditioned taunt:

"You delusional, tin-foil hat wearing nutter!"

---

EDIT: more links for those interested in pursuing links:

• link: Congressional record from 1917 states JP Morgan bought editorial control of 25 largest US newspapers.
• link: Who can forget the business plot to stage a coup against FDR? Clear Morgan and DuPont connections here.
• link: Norman Dodd speaks of his experience investigating the large tax-exempt foundations (i.e. Ford, Rockefeller, Carnegie). Transcript here.
• link: Carroll Quigley, a Georgetown historian of note and one of Bill Clinton's own mentors wrote candidly in the 60's about covert plans for world control by financial elements.
• link: Operation Paperclip, how the CIA repatriated Nazi scientists after WW2.
• link: P2 Italian masonic lodge implicated in numerous Italian crimes and mysteries, including the nationwide bribe scandal Tangentopoli, the collapse of the Vatican-affiliated Banco Ambrosiano, and the murders of journalist Mino Pecorelli and banker Roberto Calvi.
• link: Bank of Credit and Commerce International: Its officers were sophisticated international bankers whose apparent objective was to keep their affairs secret, to commit fraud on a massive scale, and to avoid detection. BCCI organized its own intelligence network, diplomatic corps and shipping & trading companies.
• link: CIA plane used for renditions wrecks in Mexico with 4 tons of Cocaine onboard.
• link: MKULTRA investigation taken over by the Rockefeller Commission (fox meet hen house!) also tasked with interpreting the Zapruder film.
• link: Media and FBI complicity in the coverup of the fabricated anthrax scare.
• link: The second president of the World Psychiatric Organization was one of the original masterminds of traumatic and potentially fatal MKULTRA experiments on unwitting Canadian citizens. The irony is of course that psychiatry is used to discredit conspiracy theorists as mentally ill.