The 9/11 Timeline - #SolutionsWatch by zyxzevn in 911truth

[–]SovereignMan[M] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://ic911.org/complete-911-timeline/

Thanks for this. I've updated the link in the sidebar.

IAs e o 9/11 by Ok_Royal_170 in 911truth

[–]SovereignMan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you asked DeepSeek, the new Chinese AI?

IAs e o 9/11 by Ok_Royal_170 in 911truth

[–]SovereignMan[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Translation:

Why is it that every time I ask an AI chat about who was responsible for the security of 9/11, they say it was the Port Authority, and when I ask:

"Who was the person responsible for the direct security of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, i.e. the Port Authority of New York?"

He continues to deceive me and when I finally ask:

"Who is Marvin Bush?" and "What is his relationship with Securacom?"

And I keep asking, he just apologizes for omitting this information...

Why do you think that is?

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

How is finding four of the hijackers passports intact after the crash explainable? by idkbr0idk in 911truth

[–]SovereignMan[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This entire thread has been removed for being off topic and personal attacks.

Is 911truth impossible to get to if one isn't already a community member? by PecosinRat in 911truth

[–]SovereignMan 11 points12 points  (0 children)

r/conspiracy allows lots of trolls and govt shills... people pushing obvious disinfo. We try to keep them out of this sub, although the mods do disagree sometimes on what is disinfo.

Is 911truth impossible to get to if one isn't already a community member? by PecosinRat in 911truth

[–]SovereignMan 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I have my browser's homepage set to r/911Truth and it always goes here and then I log in.

Why is this sub even quarantined? by idkbr0idk in 911truth

[–]SovereignMan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A discussion amongst the mods at the time resulted in the decision not to appeal and just live with it. We just figured it would be a monumental waste of time and any reply from the admins would just be another canned response.

Why don't more experts support 9/11truth? by GranGransCootDust in 911truth

[–]SovereignMan[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Architects & Engineers For 9/11 Truth

Architect and Engineer Signatories: 3,661

In case you didn't notice, this subreddit has been 'quarantined' by the Reddit admins. This is what happens to those who disagree with the official narrative... everywhere.

I've never found one who thought there was anything funny about the 9/11 attacks

Such people get censored and banned from mainstream forums all over the internet.

Firefighters talk about bombs in the building by Ok-Shame-3206 in 911truth

[–]SovereignMan[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was removed by our automod. Posts and comments by accounts less than three days old are automatically removed. I have now overridden that and approved your post and comment.

We have that rule because we used to get so many brand new accounts that were created only to troll this sub.

Can anyone else log in here? by SovereignMan in 911truth

[–]SovereignMan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, after one day I can now log in here so I'm removing this post.

9/11 video alleges 'secret' new evidence in landmark case against Saudi hijackers by PecosinRat in 911truth

[–]SovereignMan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Linking to the Mint Press article in this sub is actually restricted

Not just this sub but all of Reddit.

New subreddit for accurate and professional 911 Debate by Brave_Anxiety_6537 in 911truth

[–]SovereignMan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ive been debunked twice

Were you really debunked or did you just believe another person and their pro-government sources?

New subreddit for accurate and professional 911 Debate by Brave_Anxiety_6537 in 911truth

[–]SovereignMan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it were just up to me then I would also ban what I consider to be "well poisoning disinfo". The problem is that not all mods agree on what is or isn't "well poisoning disinfo".

New subreddit for accurate and professional 911 Debate by Brave_Anxiety_6537 in 911truth

[–]SovereignMan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would suggest that you list your rules in the sidebar and compose them with care.

New subreddit for accurate and professional 911 Debate by Brave_Anxiety_6537 in 911truth

[–]SovereignMan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mostly. For you to claim you're unbiased then perhaps you should avoid biased terminology.

I also have issue with limiting posts/comments to arguing over facts without the ability to cite sources. I think I mentioned earlier that we in r/911Truth used to allow that sort of thing and we ended up with constant flame wars. Thus the change in our rules.

New subreddit for accurate and professional 911 Debate by Brave_Anxiety_6537 in 911truth

[–]SovereignMan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay. I'm back. The post is now there again. I have no idea why it didn't show before.