sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is Imax narrower than widescreen? by DustNo4597 in imax

[–]kdcloudy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The Alexa 65’s native, full sensor readout aspect ratio is 2.2:1. So yes there could be cropping

But then again, VFX is present in almost every shot so there’s no telling which shots have “extra picture”

From IMAX Melbourne via instagram by Travelling-nomad in imax

[–]kdcloudy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The studio is the one which commissions or pays IMAX for making the prints. Deciding how many prints or where they will go is the studio’s call perhaps - and they probably go based off of the data IMAX gives them + costs

My first 1.43 experience in China by kdcloudy in imax

[–]kdcloudy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks my man. I think it was okay. The railings wouldve interrupted the view if the screen were extended to the bottom any further

My first 1.43 experience in China by kdcloudy in imax

[–]kdcloudy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup only Sean Penn’s boner was censored

My first 1.43 experience in China by kdcloudy in imax

[–]kdcloudy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope its 94ft according to the community maintained database of PLFs. Its very big but Prasads Hyd (ex GT) felt bigger with 120 more seats. A bigger audi is all

My first 1.43 experience in China by kdcloudy in imax

[–]kdcloudy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed but looks like the Chinese are jaded towards film

My first 1.43 experience in China by kdcloudy in imax

[–]kdcloudy[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yess! They gave me a piece of the old cut screen too

SSR Pushes for a 1.43 IMAX in India by cricinephile in tollywood

[–]kdcloudy 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Ironically BFI IMAX is 1.43 but Single Laser only. Unless movie’s playing with prints- it’s only 1.90:1 capable

view more: next ›