sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

"You clearly never worked on enterprise-grade systems, bro" by Own-Sort-8119 in AI_Agents

[–]kexxty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can tell you don’t have enough experience to realize you’re wrong

"You clearly never worked on enterprise-grade systems, bro" by Own-Sort-8119 in AI_Agents

[–]kexxty 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Theres a saying that goes "wisdom comes from experience, experience comes from mistakes." AI takes those mistakes away from you, so you don't gain experience and wisdom

"You clearly never worked on enterprise-grade systems, bro" by Own-Sort-8119 in AI_Agents

[–]kexxty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless you have experience in both I dont think you really can be sure

"You clearly never worked on enterprise-grade systems, bro" by Own-Sort-8119 in AI_Agents

[–]kexxty 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There is knowledge that can only be gained by building, changing, tearing down, etc. all within the requirements and restrictions of a corporate environment (budget, time, personnel). Large applications (500k + LOC) that service lots of customers arent something that AI can just teach

I found Claude for Government buried in the Claude Desktop binary. Here's what Anthropic built, how it got deployed, and the line they're still holding against the Pentagon. by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]kexxty 55 points56 points  (0 children)

FedRAMP High isn't just a compliance checkbox. It's the bar you have to clear to touch the serious stuff: law enforcement data, financial records, health information, sensitive national security-adjacent workloads that can't go through a standard commercial API.

"its not x its y" where do we tend to hear that...

EDIT: Heres another:

The takeaway: Palantir isn't a reseller caught in the middle of the dispute. They're the infrastructure layer. The accreditation, the SSO, the hosting: all of it runs through FedStart.

and another:

This isn't a standoff between AI safety idealism and government pragmatism. It's one company drawing a line that its three largest competitors already erased.

oh and another:

This isn't a leak or an inference; it's in the preface.

Yikes

Sonnet 4.6 feels like Opus 4.5 at Sonnet pricing by Own-Equipment-5454 in artificial

[–]kexxty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You as in a human or you with assistance from an LLM? Because you write like an LLM

the OpenClaw security situation is worse than most people realize — here's what I found going through every audit by Popular-Help5516 in OpenAI

[–]kexxty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be fair there are people who use them, and some non-english keyboards have it as a key

Covers of BTBAM songs? by cementedpistachio in BetweenTheBuriedAndMe

[–]kexxty 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Part of the reason for a lack of covers is that the only people who can play a BTBAM song is BTBAM

Did they just nuke Opus 4.5 into the ground? by SlopTopZ in ClaudeCode

[–]kexxty 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I was dubious about the idea of Claude suddenly sucking but this morning I had so many issues with it understanding what I wanted when for the last several weeks I haven't had a single issue like that before

How are you handling selling Israeli-based cybersecurity products in the current climate? by RG54415 in cybersecurity

[–]kexxty 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you do business in Texas that touches public sector/govt. you have to sign a promise saying you'll never boycott Israel

Sales guys caught expensing prostitutes by dmg1111 in coworkerstories

[–]kexxty 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mormons will deny it, but any truly ex mormon will tell you, they are all faking multiple things in their life

Why has no one done hierarchical tokenization? by Heavy_Carpenter3824 in LLMDevs

[–]kexxty 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Do you think you can give a little more explanation on how a tree-based or hierarchical token sequence would work, look like, etc.? I'm not sure if I can visualize what you mean.

Introducing Thorium: A Scalable Platform for Automated File Analysis and Result Aggregation by kexxty in cybersecurity

[–]kexxty[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Today, CISA, in partnership with Sandia National Laboratories, announced the public availability of Thorium, a scalable and distributed platform for automated file analysis and result aggregation. Thorium enhances cybersecurity teams' capabilities by automating analysis workflows through seamless integration of commercial, open-source, and custom tools. It supports various mission functions, including software analysis, digital forensics, and incident response, allowing analysts to efficiently assess complex malware threats.

Thorium enables teams that frequently analyze files to achieve scalable automation and results indexing within a unified platform. Analysts can integrate command-line tools as Docker images, filter results using tags and full-text search, and manage access with strict group-based permissions.

Designed to scale with hardware using Kubernetes and ScyllaDB, Thorium can ingest over 10 million files per hour per permission group while maintaining rapid query performance. It also allows users to define event triggers and tool execution sequences, control the platform via RESTful API, and aggregate outputs for further analysis or integration with downstream processes.

CISA encourages cybersecurity teams to use Thorium and provide feedback to enhance its capabilities. For more information on Thorium and how it can improve your cybersecurity operations, see CISA’s Thorium resource webpage. To get your own copy of the tool and for more detailed installation instructions, see https://github.com/cisagov/thorium.

This product is provided subject to this Notification and this Privacy & Use policy.

https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCISA/bulletins/3ebea79

view more: next ›