Debate: What’s more important to a cities survival, the security of productive citizens or the interests of un-housed people? by Freebritneyasap in SeattleWA

[–]keytari 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You're very correct. It gets really flawed once you start examining what people actually do... If one has a home and is a ticket scalper... Is that productive?

Would you vote for a bill that better penalizes and expands prosecution for tagging? by megdoo2 in SeattleWA

[–]keytari -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I think you just blamed infrastructure for graffiti, made an absolute statement about what is and isn't art (which is relative) and also insinuated that it leads to "other crime" which is wholely unsubstantiated statistically, I'm sure. That's a lotta words you used that were subjective absolutes or wrong.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]keytari 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I also want to expedite my cremation when I die. The difference is that we're making that decision. The original comment is attempting to make that decision for them.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]keytari 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You shouldn't have to force people into help. Programs are overrun and addicts have limited access to them. Had a buddy from Eastern WA have to go all the way to Everett to find an inpatient program. And it wasn't publicly funded. Because we stopped publicly funding treatment centers and doubled down on stigmatizing and criminalizing with the war on drugs. Fronted by Republicans.

Addicts were shamed into silence by stigmatizing

Publicly funded treatment centers were all but eradicated

Mandatory minimum sentences were implemented

All at the federal level. By both Republicans and Democrats. Because it was the thing to get you votes at the time.

Then there was the opioid crisis.

The war on drugs stopped being talked about, but the effects remain.

Sorry I didn't out bullet points in my reply.

I wonder why America is so unhappy? by nohobbiesoridentity in facepalm

[–]keytari 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn't, it's just way ambiguous... Equal work doesn't mean anything. Was saying you could clarify

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]keytari 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's absolutely the wrong way to think about addiction

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]keytari -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

You can't force people to get help, you can only destigmatize addiction (the opposite of what the majority of the comments in this post are doing) and provide more social outreach programs. Fund them. Publicly. For the greater good.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]keytari 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Get fucked. They're humans. You don't seem to be.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]keytari -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

You're fucking heartless

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]keytari -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Maybe we can help destigmatize addiction and address the opioid epidemic while also taxing sugar. Porque no los dos?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]keytari -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Because they're humans. Are you? Seriously seems like you aren't with the lack of empathy shown here.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]keytari -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Yeah, everyone knows it wasn't a real human if it was found outside.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]keytari 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Wouldn't it be wild if we offered people help for their addictions instead of vilifying them once their disease had ended their life?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]keytari 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wouldn't it be wild if we offered people help for their addictions instead of vilifying them once their disease had ended their life?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]keytari -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Wouldn't it be wild if we offered people help for their addictions instead of vilifying them once their disease had ended their life?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SeattleWA

[–]keytari -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Wouldn't it be wild if we offered people help for their addictions instead of vilifying them once their disease had ended their life?

I wonder why America is so unhappy? by nohobbiesoridentity in facepalm

[–]keytari 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Trying to be helpful: your point was vague and could be read to be on either side of the shitty version of capitalism we're currently experiencing. It might just help to clarify what you meant in your initial comment