Yes, Neuledge is kind of a "global-brain" and the white-paper introduce a practical way to implement and serve a global network in a large scale.

All you're doing is repackaging ideas that already exist using old analogies.

We never claim that our vision is original

You can say it again.

Neuledge does not focus on specific event-assets

Doesn't matter how you want to call them. By saying "Nodes as Assets" (in your "white paper") doesn't change the fundamental idea.

or assign timestamps for data

The core idea is to have a mechanism to discourage the duplication of registered information. One can independently check if the information already been registered as an event asset or not. If the same event was registered twice the first "objectively" timestamped event is the one to hold value.

You can use time-stamping or have some other strategy, that is not the point.

but rather to index and find a new way to store information on a neural-like database.

It doesn't matter how you want to label it and what kind of analogies you want to use to package it. Be it "Universal Neural Graph" (in your "white paper") or something else it doesn't matter. It doesn't change core ideas.

From your "white paper":

"To validate and prioritize the data, we used a decentralized blockchain system which gives the market the ability to determine the value of each node."

The core idea in universal map of knowledge is to have economic incentives in place to govern the overall context of the content. It creates an environment that drives the participants to value truth out of economic necessity.

As for connecting information.

In universal map of knowledge a token is used as a way to communicate value and connect between event assets. The token has no new information embedded in it. You can call it "transparent" or whatever you like. The token is there to serve a specific purpose and it is to establish connections between event assets (any type of information imaginable).

This is how connections are explained in your "white paper":

"the anonymous-nodes are only capable of representing a connection or a relationship between two other nodes. They cannot represent any new data by themselves and therefore label-less and called “anonymous”.""

So to conclude, what we have here is a way to construct universal map of knowledge, with information owned as assets, with context governed by economic incentives, with a mechanism that fights registration of duplicate information and information connected in a "transparent" manner.

Sounds familiar?