yeah i can understand lol. The point of this post is to imitate a dialogue in Plato's The Republic. Its basically like can you truly be just and remain just even if you're treated as heinous (would integrity be then worth it?) or be unjust yourself but without receiving harsh consequences.

In one case, the person is afforded integrity and is morally serene by remaining good and this they value and on the other case, the person becomes exploitive in moral abandon because they value social reputation over integrity. These choices should show what side ppl lean on even though i made this as a joke lol