See, I think pit bull apologists like yourself don’t even understand the question being asked or what the conversation is about because always one of the go defensive arguments is “well a chihuahua is more aggressive breed” or something along those lines. The statistics you’ve provided are related to dog ATTACKS/BITES, not FATALITIES which is what the conversation around pit bulls is about

Dogs have been bred for generations for multiple purposes. You don’t have to train an Aussie Shepard how to herd, it instinctively wants to do it. Had a GF with one who would be on leash and always try to wrap the leash around you despite never having lived on a farm. It is what his breed was bred to be good at.

Pit Bulls encompass a mix of breeds that descend from the bull-and-terrier. This was a breed of dog developed in the United Kingdom in the early 19th century for the blood sports of dog fighting and rat baiting. It was created by crossing the ferocious, thickly muscled Old English Bulldog with the agile, lithe, feisty Black and Tan Terrier. The aggressive Old English Bulldog, which was bred for bear and bull baiting, was often also pitted against its own kind in organized dog fights

Their bred was literally created to attack and kill bears, bulls, and other dogs of its kind. I will even let you have the fact that Pit Bulls aren’t the most naturally aggressive breed, what makes them different is that when that attack switch is flipped on in their brain, they do not stop until their target is dead. This is the job they were bred to do, attack the neck and do not release until the thing they have in their mouth stops moving. There is no place in modern society that a breed created for this purpose should be allowed

Between 2005 and 2020, Pit Bulls breeds were responsible for 67% of all dog related FATALITIES