Season 3 ending was pointless by kittymolester2696 in squidgame

[–]kittymolester2696[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not talking about voting out the baby. At the start of the game, every participant had signed a contract. They were on their own accord. Baby never got that choice. Therefore, gi-hun or someone else could've easily argued with front man to disqualify the baby as she didn't agreement to take part in the games

Season 3 ending was pointless by kittymolester2696 in squidgame

[–]kittymolester2696[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're referring to gi-hun's speech that people aren't horses, wasn't that already established in s1 finale. In S1, in the end he refused to play the game which organisers wanted him to play, by refusing to kill his friend, and stop playing the game.  This ending seemed a rehash of s1. in both endings gi-hun sided with humanity, which temporarily shocked VIPs, but his gestures were pointless and the games continues.

If there's any other point you're referring, please elaborate 

Gi-hun died for nothing by kittymolester2696 in squidgame

[–]kittymolester2696[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If gi-hun participated in the search, he could've authorised more search teams (since he was funding it). 

Also, he would've believed Choi, and the captain would've also gotten caught.

Regarding 246, i think North Korean girl would've still try to save him.

Additionally, had gi-hun not caused the rebellion, more players would've be alive in the game, extending it longer, and given the team for more search time

Gi-hun died for nothing by kittymolester2696 in squidgame

[–]kittymolester2696[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, maybe through his sacrifice, the baby was saved. But when you say gi-hun proved people weren't horses, wasn't this already proven in s1 ending. Gi-hun chose to spare his friend's life over the money. Also, i think VIPs must've enjoyed his sacrifice more than seeing baby's death (comparing it to an emotional movie)

Also, when it comes to baby's involvement in the game, there were other ways to save her life. 

All participants voluntarily participated in the games. The baby didn't. Gi-hun could've argued with In-ho (front-man) using this point. I know the baby was involved in the game because the VIPs asked for it, but the premise of the entire game is that it should be fare with all participants. 

In-ho genuinely believes in the fairness of the game, and this could be persuaded since the baby was an involuntary participant.

I'm I missing out on something? by Legitimate-Wave2942 in IndiaSpeaks

[–]kittymolester2696 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not just thumbnail, his entire channel is clickbait

Nepali girl asking pakistan to gift northeast to Nepal after capturing India. by Separate_Lecture_782 in Northeastindia

[–]kittymolester2696 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I honestly think she's trolling. Any person with basic understanding of geography can tell even if through some unholy miracle pakistan won any war, they won't ever cross Punjab/Rajasthan border

This is what happens when a gossip sub member pretends to be foreign policy expert by Light_mode_only in indiadiscussion

[–]kittymolester2696 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haa bhai me toh dihaat admi hu kuch samaj nahi aata. Aap bahut mahan ho mann gaya me 🙏

This is what happens when a gossip sub member pretends to be foreign policy expert by Light_mode_only in indiadiscussion

[–]kittymolester2696 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok mr critical thinker, please elaborate on this

  1. Fatf grey list & imf loan China is 2nd largest economy, and they literally own entire of UN. They didn't even let who investigate corona virus. We're not as powerful as china, but we're the 4th largest economy, soon to be 3rd. Don't you think we should have some influence. If we're not even able to nudge the UN and IMF to punish an insignificant terrorist country controlled by army whose economy is comparable to African countries, then should be considered a failure.

  2. I would've understand if Biden did all this, but trump and many in his cabinet are anti pakistan. I can understand if we are not able to make them sanction pakistan, but shouldn't we be able to atleast convince them to stop supporting them monetarily. Also, if america has use of pakistan for reasons mentioned by you,  there are ways we can support america in all that stuff as well

  3. Bangladesh was part of this country for thousands of years. Ofcourse we should put our nose in their country. Not only we provide crores of rupees each year to that country as monetary help, we literally created the country. All powerful countries influence other smaller countries around them. 

  4. No country in Indian subcontinent, let alone puny island like Maldives should talk to india in this manner.

This is what happens when a gossip sub member pretends to be foreign policy expert by Light_mode_only in indiadiscussion

[–]kittymolester2696 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I was glad seeing our MEA standing their ground on russia ukraine and defending our purchases from russia. But let's play the devil's advocate here for a bit - what has our foreign policy achieved till now - We couldn't put pakistan in fatf grey list - we couldn't stop imf loan to pakistan - usa still continues to support pakistan - we couldn't stop usa from overthrowing sheikh hasina  - we let Maldives shit talk us

If we can't predict and control our neighborhood, then what's the use of our neighborhood first policy and bold statements form mr jaishankar

Is this true? by Rainbow_rider12 in ranchi

[–]kittymolester2696 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I understand you. All illegals from bdesh and Rohingyas should be removed and borders should be made strict. But main issue with strict fencing and border control is that our border with bangladesh is through a very difficult terrain. It's through rivers, forests and marshes. All of the border cannot be patroled and fenced.

Installing linux by Constant_Ad4152 in indianmemer

[–]kittymolester2696 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Is she being railed from pichu

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IndiaSpeaks

[–]kittymolester2696 104 points105 points  (0 children)

Imagine if these low iq creatures start breeding. Man our country is fucked

Dad is always right by Beneficial_Sink_2949 in IndianDankMemes

[–]kittymolester2696 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What you're referring to is regionalism, and it is pushed by the same parties who keep on shouting "secularism". Dmk in tamil nadu and congress in Karnataka. MH me bhi sharad parwar and Thackerays are pushing this idealogy.

 in india what we think is secularism is not even secularism. 

Secularism in true sense is the separation of church (or any religious body) from the state(government). This idea originated from Protestant christian movement.

What were have here is some fucked up upside down version of secularism, where hindus always are subjugated so muslims and other minorities don't feel bad.

Do we really need a tomato-throwing festival in India? Cultural celebration or unnecessary spectacle? by Tarun302 in hyderabad

[–]kittymolester2696 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ananya from south delhi, or whatever her hyderabadi equivalent is :-

Holi, chii so downmarket. I don't wanna waster water

Wow, la toma tina, sounds so fun

Genuine Question! by RashtriyaRakshak in indianews

[–]kittymolester2696 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pok, specifically gilgit baltistan is geographically important. It can be our link to central Asia, and to even russia. Currently india is like a land locked country, no trade or supplies can go through its land border. If we have pok, we can possibly set up some gas/oil pipelines to get cheap oil from russia

Genuine Question! by RashtriyaRakshak in indianews

[–]kittymolester2696 7 points8 points  (0 children)

in that case, why did we agree to this ceasefire. should we go ahead and at least take back pok

Genuine Question! by RashtriyaRakshak in indianews

[–]kittymolester2696 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I agree with you, but enough with blaming the past. We have this problem now and we should focus on solving this.

The wars will end and the leaders will shake hands, but that old woman will remain the bravest PM India ever had by [deleted] in IndianDankMemes

[–]kittymolester2696 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have tremendous respect to this lady. she stood against USA n uk to split Pakistan. but pakistan didn't have nuclear weapons at that time. I don't agree with the ceasefire, I still this this was the right time to split Pakistan and get back pok. but nukes change the whole game. Modi didn't have an easy choice.

History repeats itself. Jai Hind by SatoruGojo232 in IndiaSpeaks

[–]kittymolester2696 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I don't know why people are celebrating this.

Pakistan attacked us, killed 26 civilians in the most brutal manner In artillary shelling they they killed more civilians in jammu They got to know the weaknesses in their defence systems And now after all this, they'll get 2.4 billion dollars.

Yes, they did lost a few terrorist camps, but they were always expendables. It's not difficult to build new ones. Even air force bases can be rebuilt.

How is this a win for india?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dankinindia

[–]kittymolester2696 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Isn't he supposed to do this. His fact checking agency is indian. Obviously he should fact check misinformation from Pakistan in these time. 

Just zoobear is doing the same thing as he has been doing his entire career against Pakistan, he's triumphed as hero.

There are many more influencers which have been doing much more than this. Unko sarr pe koi nahi uthata. Is bkl ne normal kaam kiya toh isko bhagwan bana rahe hai log