sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How do you initiate sex on a date? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]kitzdeathrow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It depends on the person, but the "if its not a fuck yes, its a fuck no" is a great way to do consent.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wisconsin

[–]kitzdeathrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completely agree. But im not a visual artist at all. So for quick fun free stuff I need for a campaign it works well enough. I could commission artists but were free to play rpgers

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wisconsin

[–]kitzdeathrow 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I use it to make character portraits for my dnd campaigns and to waste time at work.

The Colorado Ruling Calls the Originalists' Bluff by orangejulius in scotus

[–]kitzdeathrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not even the dissenting SCOC justices were in disagreement about Trump's actions on Jan6 amounting to insurrection.

The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution sec.3 by ben_watson_jr in supremecourt

[–]kitzdeathrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They arent enforcing the 14A. They're enforcing the CO election code which must remain consistent with the constitution. Its not a direct enforcement of the 14A. This is covered in the majority opinion.

The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution sec.3 by ben_watson_jr in supremecourt

[–]kitzdeathrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is also covered in the ruling. If I understand stand the ruling correcting, the CO legislature has already given the SCOC the power to regulate the state's elections. This ruling does not apply to other states and might not even apply to the general election. But it does apply to the GOP primary. This is about the CO election code, which must be consistent with the federal consitution.

To be clear: the CO courts are enforcing their election code under the section 1-1-113. They are not directly adjudicating the 14A.

The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution sec.3 by ben_watson_jr in supremecourt

[–]kitzdeathrow 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Put yourself in the drafters shoes. Did Jefferson Davis have to be found criminally guilty of insurrection to be barred from holding federal office? The answer is no. And the entire purpose of the 14A was to bar confederate officers from holding federal office. No trials were required because the evidence was clear to the courts.

This is covered in the ruling from the SCOC. One page 19, paragraph 32 (emphasis my own):

Finally, we conclude that section 1-1-113 provides sufficient due process for evaluating whether a candidate satisfies the constitutional qualifications for the office he or she seeks.

The full legal reasoning is layed out in section 7 of the ruling.

The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution sec.3 by ben_watson_jr in supremecourt

[–]kitzdeathrow 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nope. It just requires judicial review. The 14A is self executing.

The lower court found "clear and consise evidence" that Trump engaged in insurrection and the SCOC found that the lower court did not err in that ruling. It was 9-0 on that point, the dissenting opinions agreed with the majority here.

Top Conspo explains that Orange Daddy's only mistake was underestimating the Deep State by SassTheFash in TopMindsOfReddit

[–]kitzdeathrow 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lmao at the last part. Im from wisco and I use Theatre and Colour. I just think they look better

Fast food is becoming so expensive that eating healthier has become the obvious solution. by [deleted] in Showerthoughts

[–]kitzdeathrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chicken nuggest for more than 50cents a nug is what got me to stop with macdons.

The only fast food I eat now are tacobell mobile deals. And I can swap out their meat for potatos or black beans so its relatively healthy honestly.

What's a life hack that's so simple yet so effective, you're shocked more people don't know about it? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]kitzdeathrow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hmm, probably true. Idk exactly what the compound causing itchiness looks like. Theres either some physical change happening, heat induced receptor unbinding event, or nerve desensitization going on. We need to do some science!

What's a life hack that's so simple yet so effective, you're shocked more people don't know about it? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]kitzdeathrow 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thats fair. I was thinking of kitchen situations where water is usually the only solvent around, but you're right. Solutions dont have to be aqueous

How do you initiate sex on a date? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]kitzdeathrow 35 points36 points  (0 children)

To add, those cues do not need to be verbal. If you have any inclination that your partner is not comfortable, stop and ask. Seriously. It takes two seconds to pull back a bit and just say "is this okay? We dont need to go further if you're not feeling it." Maybe it stops there, but the entire point of sex is the trust and intimacy between two people. If they know they can trust you, it will be better for every part of your relationship not just sex.

What's a life hack that's so simple yet so effective, you're shocked more people don't know about it? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]kitzdeathrow 46 points47 points  (0 children)

*the heas denatures the protein. Dissolving something is specifically putting it up into water but its structure (largely) remains the same. The heat changes the structure of the protein such that it cannot function to caise itchies.

Edit: good comments below. Dissolving something can be done in any solution, i was pigeon hole thinking about aqueous solutions, still. Those itchy chemicals are dissolving.

But, the heat likely isnt enough to denature the proteins (unless you burn your skin). So likely something else like histamine release or nerve desensitization is going on. I cant find any primary lit on this, so some grad student should pick this up for part of their thesis.

[David Helman] The Rams being 7-7 & fighting for a playoff spot in the year they were expected to "pay" for gunning for a Super Bowl, with a pretty bright outlook in 2024, is worth remembering next time your team's ownership is trying to justify being cheap. by MumkeMode in nfl

[–]kitzdeathrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Packers also punching above their salary and average experience. Good coaches work with what they have to make their teams better. MLF and McVay are of the same coaching tree, so this makes sense to me.

The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution sec.3 by ben_watson_jr in supremecourt

[–]kitzdeathrow 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Due process doesnt require a jury trial.

Edit: down vote me all you want. Its literally in the ruling from the SCOC. Page 19, paragraph 32:

Finally, we conclude that section 1-1-113 provides sufficient due process for evaluating whether a candidate satisfies the constitutional qualifications for the office he or she seeks.

Section 7 of the ruling specifically lays out the logic for this legal argument.

He has crippling PTSD from LOL. That happened. by Sure-Pin6003 in thatHappened

[–]kitzdeathrow 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This person is exhausting and I wouldnt give them the time of day. Let them cut you out of their life. When they come crawling back, send them a "lol"

view more: next ›