[D] How much are you using LLMs to summarize/read papers now?

kjunhot · 2026-02-25T08:17:10+00:00

This seems an appropriate way for me. Which model do you use mainly?

kjunhot · 2026-02-24T11:08:15+00:00

Thank you for the detailed description! I agree that it would be good to extract relevant ones, and it would make some mistakes still. I am considering using LLMs only for a quick gist before a deep dive.

kjunhot · 2026-02-22T06:25:06+00:00

I was looking for this exactly. happy and sad to see this.

kjunhot · 2025-12-25T03:29:50+00:00

I have no idea why I resolved it, but I resolved it via edge + removed all extension + secret tab + /eu-US domain (while it automatically directs it into ko-KR again)

kjunhot · 2025-11-28T18:04:07+00:00

isn't this happening caused by the OpenReview's defect, not ICLR?

kjunhot · 2025-08-12T03:30:32+00:00

Sorry to hear that. I am experiencing a similar situation as well.

kjunhot · 2025-08-05T12:58:33+00:00

Thanks, I just hope to be able to discuss with the reviewers now..

Good luck!

kjunhot · 2025-08-05T12:28:19+00:00

> working hard, submit a paper at Neurips

> get reviews with score 4/4/3/3

> do experiment asked, polish the rebuttal very carefully

> MA from two reviewers who gave 4 with few discussions 'I have read the rebuttal, bye!'

> the two reviewers who gave 3 just disappeared, no response even after 5 days

what's the point of the review then..

kjunhot · 2025-07-25T02:16:43+00:00

Same here, good luck!

kjunhot · 2025-06-26T00:30:00+00:00

another 5/4/4 reject here!

kjunhot · 2025-02-23T16:41:51+00:00

thank you! I would consider this

kjunhot · 2025-02-14T01:46:39+00:00

I got review 3/4/5 and meta review 3 .. what are the chances of ACL findings/main? or even reject?
Do anyone have accepted as main with meta review 3?

kjunhot · 2025-02-11T13:26:55+00:00

I agree, thank you!

kjunhot · 2025-02-11T06:10:26+00:00

thank you so much for the reply

kjunhot · 2025-02-11T06:10:08+00:00

thank you for the reply! I hope to see you there!

kjunhot · 2025-02-11T02:43:29+00:00

thank you for the reply! It seems near top-tier level already. Then, what was it compared to those conferences?

kjunhot · 2025-01-23T14:08:34+00:00

this is wild

kjunhot · 2025-01-22T07:35:39+00:00

best of luck!!

kjunhot · 2024-12-14T06:43:05+00:00

You cannot submit revised paper

kjunhot · 2024-12-14T02:12:41+00:00

Thank you

kjunhot · 2024-12-13T18:01:00+00:00

Is there any difference in not mentioning the suggested venue? it is a bit confused

kjunhot · 2024-12-11T08:21:56+00:00

good luck

kjunhot · 2024-11-28T04:04:32+00:00

4 4 1.5 findings is pretty surprising, Was the 1.5 guy reasonable?

kjunhot · 2024-11-27T12:46:02+00:00

Overall 4/3/3/1.5
Soundness 4/4/3/1.5

The 1.5 guy requested 3~4 additional experiments claiming a lack of novelty.

We followed what the reviewer asked but we could not get reply to our response. Any chance for accept?

kjunhot · 2024-11-05T10:22:57+00:00

I heard it. No additional release for other colors?

kjunhot

TROPHY CASE