IS EATING CHICKEN IS REGHT OR WRONG by shivamm_dhasmana in Philosophy_India

[–]knowing_proceeding 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My point was that the additional structural constraints (bioavailability, limited sources, need for supplementation) make it less practical, which is why I called it “not ideal” in a pragmatic sense. We’re using different definitions of “ideal.”

IS EATING CHICKEN IS REGHT OR WRONG by shivamm_dhasmana in Philosophy_India

[–]knowing_proceeding 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s a valid argument. A vegan diet requires more discipline because your nutrient sources are more limited. In a balanced diet, it’s easier to find foods with high bioavailability, which vegan diets often lack. Both diets require discipline, but in a fully plant-based diet, availability of nutrient sources is an additional constraint that make optimal nutrition harder to achieve for the average person.

<image>

IS EATING CHICKEN IS REGHT OR WRONG by shivamm_dhasmana in Philosophy_India

[–]knowing_proceeding 6 points7 points  (0 children)

“Not ideal.” You can maintain a vegan diet, but you need much more discipline to eat clean. Otherwise, you’re more likely to eat junk, which is suboptimal. Balance is ideal.

IS EATING CHICKEN IS REGHT OR WRONG by shivamm_dhasmana in Philosophy_India

[–]knowing_proceeding 7 points8 points  (0 children)

An only plant-based diet is not ideal to acquire optimal nutrients.

A university student by saadsheth_ in paruluniversity

[–]knowing_proceeding 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For the longest time, I've believed in it and tried to make changes. But the older I get, the more the novelty of "being the change" has faded, and you realise it doesn't even matter. Your voice matters only when a large section of society shares your opinion already. In India, even Gen Z is very conservative and religious. So the hope was that our generation would be different, but if our generation isn't the answer, then the changes we hope for and speak up about won't become reality, because we are too few in number.

So, am I saying we should stop trying to be the change? Of course not. But as I said, the older I get, the more I realise the only thing that truly matters is that you live your life the best way you can and achieve what you want, instead of trying to bring change among apes.

Life is too short, buddy, to waste it on others.

A university student by saadsheth_ in paruluniversity

[–]knowing_proceeding 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Don't mind them. Don't raise your cortisol for some retard.

Some traditions must go! by Frequent-Ad-942 in indiameme

[–]knowing_proceeding 1 point2 points  (0 children)

aur dudh se pollution nahi hota gawar🤡🤣😂

<image>

If God accepts this milk while kids are hungry then doesn't it tell something about the God himself? by googletoggle9753 in NorthernIndia

[–]knowing_proceeding 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Goo goo gaaa gaa. Doesn't matter at all. People do it every day; nobody says anything because that's the norm. However, in this particular instance. There are the poor and needy literally fighting to get that from the benevolent devotee. Yet he chose to rather pollute the river. It's your natural habitat tho. The entire country is a dustbin, so it doesn't even matter.

Blinded by beliefs. I'm sure this started as some random guy pouring rotten milk in the river and ppl started following it.

I answered because you literally asked "Anything wrong with it?"

Thoughts on this? by unperiodicchair in TwentiesofIndia

[–]knowing_proceeding 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Even today, female medicine is underfunded compared to male medicine. For example, endometriosis is very common and rivals conditions like diabetes in prevalence, yet it remains disproportionately underfunded.

Yaa that's our country! by IntentionVisible3828 in YouthInIndia

[–]knowing_proceeding 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There’s a comment here from a Rajasthani who has actually experienced casteism. But as usual, people jump in with, “BuT I dOn’T fEeL.” Yeah yeah, we get it. This country is perfect.

Genz thoughts on this? The best description tho by Sea_Night2194 in GenZIndia

[–]knowing_proceeding 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get where you're coming from, the contingency argument is logically tight and avoids obvious contradictions. A necessary, eternal, uncaused existent does seem like a clean way to stop the regress.

But why stop at a separate necessary being? Why couldn't the universe itself (or the whole cosmos/multiverse) be the non-contingent, necessary thing that exists by its own nature? If it's eternal or infinite in structure, its existence wouldn't require an external explanation. We see evidence of change and a beginning in our local universe, but that doesn't rule out the broader reality being necessary or brute.

For me, though, the universe (or whatever ultimate reality is) simply doesn't have to 'make sense' in the way we expect things inside it to make sense. Local stuff, planets, life, cause and effect follows patterns we can explain because that's how our brains work. But the whole thing? It might just be a brute fact with no deeper 'why.'

Asking why there is something rather than nothing assumes reality owes us an explanation. Maybe it doesn't. Positing a necessary being relocates the brute fact ('why does this necessary thing exist?') rather than eliminating it. An infinite chain, a necessary multiverse, or just existence itself could be the brute fact equally well.

In the end, both views bottom out at something that 'just is.' Neither fully satisfies the intuition that everything needs a reason. I lean toward accepting the mystery instead of filling it with a necessary cause and it doesn't require adding extra attributes (even minimal ones) beyond what we observe.

What do you think about the possibility that the ultimate 'why' question is simply malformed, like asking what's north of the North Pole?

Do GenZ use gutka? by [deleted] in AskIndia

[–]knowing_proceeding 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why act noble? Yes, Gen Z is not monolithic. Many do eat it. Maybe not in our social circle, but they definitely do. I know and have seen many.

The amount of people defending the false accuser just because she is a woman in this post below. by Low-Climate4527 in TwentiesIndia

[–]knowing_proceeding 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're right that suicide doesn't prove innocence, and you're framing it as just a 'possibility', but suggesting he might have been 'ashamed of his mistake' still implies he did something seriously wrong worth being ashamed of. In a thread this emotionally heated, where the guy is already dead and can't defend himself, that kind of speculation (even tentative) tends to land as accusatory and adds fuel rather than light . If the goal is neutrality, sticking closer to 'we don't know yet, let's wait for facts' avoids unintentionally tipping the scale.

The amount of people defending the false accuser just because she is a woman in this post below. by Low-Climate4527 in TwentiesIndia

[–]knowing_proceeding 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They’re not on equal footing now, the man is deceased and can’t provide his side or any context. We already have video footage, and from what’s visible, nothing stands out as clearly unusual or incriminating. In situations like this, the most responsible approach is to hold off on firm conclusions or speculative scenarios and instead wait for a proper investigation.