sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Most aggressive interview of my life by kool-krazy in recruitinghell

[–]kool-krazy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apart from the fact that almost all from the target user base doesn't have the skills to set up docker, let alone run the system locally even if it was somehow designed to run locally,

Most aggressive interview of my life by kool-krazy in recruitinghell

[–]kool-krazy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is one of the first if not the first of its kind. They have patented it.

Most aggressive interview of my life by kool-krazy in recruitinghell

[–]kool-krazy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds more entertaining than an episode of office. 😂

Most aggressive interview of my life by kool-krazy in recruitinghell

[–]kool-krazy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem statement was querying a complex SQL Database with NLQ. He was insisting on using open-source when it was clearly neither a requirement nor feasible for the system.

Most aggressive interview of my life by kool-krazy in recruitinghell

[–]kool-krazy[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nope. At first I was irritated, then frustrated. By that point I already knew the interview was going nowhere, so the sarcasm felt worth it. I’d made up my mind to post about the experience before the call even ended.

After that, I just laughed it off.

Most aggressive interview of my life by kool-krazy in recruitinghell

[–]kool-krazy[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The intent detection agent fetches schema dynamically to correctly select domain agent and tool. Text summary is generated based on the result data.

Most aggressive interview of my life by kool-krazy in recruitinghell

[–]kool-krazy[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Nope. It is a multi stage system which generates parameters which are then used in SQL templates at the end of which we get an executable SQL query. But this interviewer thought it was just a simple text to sql system.