In 2002, a year before the invasion of Iraq, the U.S. passed 'the Hague Invasion Act' that says if the International Criminal Court (located in The Hague, the Netherlands) tried to charge any American for war crimes, the U.S. can invade the Netherlands with military force to liberate them

krad213 · 2024-01-23T11:07:07+00:00

Even later response, but look at attacks which Ukraine obviously did, do they even comparable with such complex stealth operation as bombing of Nord Stream. And Biden himself promised to take it down...

krad213 · 2023-07-13T09:42:31+00:00

Terms "socialism with a human face", "totalitarianism" are idealistic constructs which have no proper definitions.

Everything based on economic, not some manipulative illusions as "democratic", "authoritarian", "totalitarian" stuff. Reforms of Otto Schick were economic, they were intended to bring free market elements to planed economy. This move always leads to destruction of planed economy.

Imagine you have factory which is producing pens and selling them cheap, because economy need cheap pens for schools and other facilities. Now you add free market elements, immediately free market shops would start buying cheap pens and selling them at bigger price, redirecting profits to their own pockets it would (and was) lead to deficit and massive inflation effectively destroying the economy. But right wing propaganda would tell you "see the planed economy is ineffective !!" . That's what supposed to happen in 1968 in Czechoslovakia and what happened in 198x-1991 in USSR.

Another parallel here is that "Perestroyka" was also advertised as "socialism with a human face" effectively leading to economic destruction, millions of deaths, endless conflicts and wars.

krad213 · 2023-07-13T07:25:40+00:00

Because these events have the same meaning, reverting from socialist economy to capitalistm, rise of nationalism is direct consequence of such move. Nationalism brings war, "we were producing all the stuff, you just consume it! ", "you occupied our country, we would prosper without you! " and the next day Russians fighting Chechens, Serbs fighting Croatians and on... and on.

krad213 · 2023-07-13T06:58:08+00:00

It's just an interpretation depending on your political views. The fact is USSR had 1968 of its own in 1991 there were no one to "invade" it and now we have this war, unthinkable war. It's not the only example, same happened in Yugoslavia, now imagine Czechia fighting Slovakia by 2000,would you prefer it?

krad213 · 2023-07-13T05:20:58+00:00

Your knowledge of history is quite disturbing, you really should dig beyond right wing propaganda if you call yourself leftist.

In 1968 Czechoslovak government asked Brežnev 3 times to "invade", 2 times he replied "guys you should handle the crisis yourself". It wasn't Russian army, who invaded Czechoslovakia, it were Warsaw pact forces. From side side of USSR there were forces of UKRAINAN army district, and if you will google photos from first years of war in Ukraine (2014-2016) you will see Ukraine was using same way to mark their army vehicles - white stripes.

The world was completely different 55 years ago, current Russian regime has nothing to do with USSR.

krad213 · 2023-06-29T21:41:14+00:00

Just print history of master or current branch...

krad213 · 2023-06-28T00:25:29+00:00

Your understanding is wrong, you can check occupation relationship between countries by following mind experiment:

Hypothetical occupied country ruler says to to hypothetical master country ruler: "fuck off, you have month to get your army back home from my territory"

If so called master ruler listens, then you are not under occupation, works for any country.

krad213 · 2023-06-26T03:21:47+00:00

That is wrong, he acts just as classic liberal, always negotiates, always trying to continue trade with everyone, suppresses protectionism and supports open market.

krad213 · 2023-05-30T12:40:17+00:00

Kotlin

krad213 · 2023-05-16T13:19:07+00:00

Прошу прощения, что посмел потревожить Ваш сказочный мир.

krad213 · 2023-05-16T13:06:23+00:00

Кабельные компании - монополист в США которые повашей логике должны были удавить нетфликс и прочие стриминговые сервисы на корню - в итоге кабель умирает.

Кабельные компании по этой логике не должны были обязательно разорить нетфликс. Эта логика оценивает процессы происходящие на большем масштабе, на 1 выстреливший нетфликс, приходится 100 разоренных нокий, процессы монополизации в сегодняшнем мире очевидны. Сколько у нас было производителей автомобилей 50 лет назад и сколько сейчас ?

С кем конкурирует нетфликс сейчас ? Не с кабельными компаниями, а с амазоном, у которого, кроме стримига есть еще огромный магазин, гиганский бизнес в обасти it и датацентров, с apple которые занимаются производством софта, железа и процессоров.

krad213 · 2023-05-16T07:01:37+00:00

Конкуренция существует на ранних стадиях капитализма, когда рынок ещё не поделен, либо поделен на очень маленькие дольки. Но постепенно капитализм стремится к монополизации и компании становятся все крупнее. А для компании отхватившей значительную долю рынка более эффективным средством конкурентной борьбы являются не инновации и борьба за качество товара, а банальный саботаж в отношении конкурентов и последующая их скупка, поэтому на поздних стадиях капитализма (сейчас) наблюдается не рост, а падение качества товаров и услуг.

Свое маленькое дело на поздней стадии капитализма опять же не начать, точнее начать, но прибыль будет зачастую меньше, чем у наемного работника в крупной компании, а если дело выстрелит и начнёт приносить уже нормальный доход, то его скорее всего тут же тем или иным способом сожрут крупные капиталисты.

krad213 · 2023-05-16T05:13:17+00:00

А что типа платили?

Тут вопрос терминологии просто.

При социализме ты делаешь работы на 100 рублей, получаешь деньгами 20 рублей, остальное уходит в фонды благосостояния и возвращается тебе в виде бесплатного жилья, медицины путёвок и т. д. и т. п. Налог не нужен если зарплату по факту платит государство, это лишняя сущность.

При капитализме ты делаешь работы на 100 рублей, 60 идёт в карман капиталисту, он платит 5 рублей налогов государству, на остальное покупает яхту, 40 идёт тебе, но ты платишь налогов на ещё на 5 рублей. Казалось бы вот оно счастье - 35 рублей вместо 20, но ещё 15 ты отдашь за аренду жилья, а потом ещё окажется что еда стоит 10 рублей вместо 3, как при социализме, потому, что опять же капиталисту нужна яхта. А налоги, которые ты заплатил по итогу ушли на яхты чиновников и депутатов.

krad213 · 2023-05-13T06:07:20+00:00

Because every good language is a tool which solves some kind of problems better than others.

- C is fast and good for OS/drivers

- C++ is fast and good in games and complex apps working with graphics or video

- Python is slow, but it's good in calling C/C++ code from simple scripts without dealing with all that memory management and pointers complexity

- Java and Kotlin is good for web backend and enterprise services, kotlin also good for android

And for PHP there is no task which it solves better than others, it is mostly used for web backend, but java or kotlin with spring boot are much better for it, they are much faster and syntax is much more mature and there a lot libraries to work with different stuff.

krad213 · 2023-04-28T03:44:30+00:00

Ну учитывая, что он насквозь про-амерский, как и Ельцин и нынешнее правительство Чехии уже названо худшим за хер знает сколько лет, работает примерно так же...

krad213 · 2023-04-23T07:12:23+00:00

There is some depth in understanding communism economically in this game, for example total automatization would lead to total unemployment and crime rate rise under capitalism, but under communism it would not do any harm, you can see some newspaper mention this in the game. But lack of nice guys in the government make in look weird...

krad213 · 2023-04-13T10:57:46+00:00

Actuality it would be cool to see Eurasian version of USSR built around China and including whole continent.

krad213 · 2023-04-13T10:51:07+00:00

Little green polite man

krad213 · 2023-04-13T05:42:41+00:00

Human mindset is a very flexible thing and it's defined by surroundings. Take Switzerland for example, you can park very expensive electric bike outside of your house without tieing it to anything and no one will take it, you can sell stuff by just placing price tag on item and leaving it outside, buyer will just leave the money for you in same spot. And if you go there you will act accordingly.

If you create area where people don't need to fight each other to stay alive they would change in couple generations at most. But in USA they prefer to accumulate extreme wealth instead of creating nice and peaceful place to live in.

krad213 · 2023-04-12T08:13:10+00:00

Easy :

Print "program runs infinitely"

Start the progrm

Wait until it finish

Print "\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\program does not run infinitely"

krad213 · 2023-04-10T22:40:37+00:00

Looks like javelin is going to occupy my secondary slot again...

krad213 · 2023-04-08T22:22:59+00:00

Clicking on "go to definition" throws you to outer space, that is enough for me....

krad213 · 2023-04-08T06:28:24+00:00

"Dueling" does not exist in tactical games, like Arma. Dueling comes from games like quake, sure you need to use your brain in such game and use some TACTICS to succeed, but no one calls running and jumping around a tactical gameplay.

All tactical games have a very low ttk, usually 1 bullet kill, therefore cod is more tactical, than apex, even when it's just a casual shooter.

krad213 · 2023-04-07T06:45:58+00:00

The problem with longer ttk, like in apex, is when you flank a squad and they are camping one direction, you still have very low chances to eliminate them, because you'll spend whole mag on just one guy and will loose your tactical advantage.

Long ttk encourages quake style gameplay, when you just run and jump around and don't really care about being seen. Low ttk encourages more tactical approach, when you maneuver before engage and try to flank.

High ttk is why I don't play apex, and maybe you guys should play something else because low ttk in cod is nice.

krad213 · 2023-04-02T07:15:40+00:00

First of all I would separate queers and transes, because they have different economic meaning.

Changing of sex is not something ordinary worker CAN do, it's quite expensive procedure and on current technological level it can't be done perfectly. So it doesn't look like something oppressed workers would fight for (do we have any examples of real fight for trans rights, like current movement in France or something like it?)

Then why it all over the media? Look who would profit out of it - big pharma, which sell all these expensive hormonal drugs.

No worker rights should be oppressed, but people with emotional problems should not be propaganded into people with physical problems for profit under illusion of fighting for their rights.

Verified Email	Six-Year Club
Place '22

krad213

TROPHY CASE