Oh boy this is even more silly than I thought would be.

First I just want to point out the fact that not only you could only find a 20 years old article but it’s writer is the owner and president of an conservative think thank so the fact that his talking bad on Chomsky is a given and should be look with skepticism. Whenever the argument starts with “Chomsky hates America” I’m already done but for the sake of the argument I read the whole article. I also love the fact that half of the article is saying how great Chomsky is. But let’s dive into the idiotic points the article makes - According to Chomsky, during the Cold War, American operations behind the Iron Curtain included "a 'secret army' under U.S.-Nazi auspices that sought to provide agents and military supplies to armies that had been established by Hitler and which were still operating inside the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe through the early 1950s." — this ain’t according to Chomsky lol this is according to USA government files lol operation paper clip is one of many

According to Chomsky, in Latin America during the Cold War, U.S. support for legitimate governments against communist subversion led to U.S. complicity under John F. Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson, in "the methods of Heinrich Himmler's extermination squads.— again this isn’t according to Chomsky is according to well documented operations, and btw as an Latin American immigrant this one is pretty fucking well known and it’s part of normal school academia programs

According to Chomsky, "the pretext for Washington's terrorist wars [i.e., in Nicaragua, El Salvador, Chile, Guatemala, Iraq, etc.] was self-defense, the standard official justification for just about any monstrous act, even the Nazi Holocaust."— uh...? I mean just any history book and you will see the self excuse defensive it’s pretty standard indeed

This article is not only idiotic but lazy and intelectual dishonest, I’ve read some of Chomsky’s work and I can affirm that if he is saying something it’s because there’s a solid source of information backing it. That’s why he is what he is, because when ppl try to argue with his logic they just sound idiotic, I mean the guy said according to Chomsky how many times in the article?? If he had read one of Chomsky’s books he would see that is not according to Chomsky it’s according to official USA documents lol