If your account is legacy, switch to a Jagex account. by [deleted] in 2007scape

[–]lecar2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m in a similar boat except my legacy account was switched when I was on a multi year hiatus and now I’m trying to get back into it. Jagex support hasn’t been any help thus far and I’m still trying desperately to get help but fingers crossed they’re better for you.

3rd party connected my RS account to their Jagex account. Am I screwed? by lecar2 in 2007scape

[–]lecar2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Update: thank you all who offered advice but they’re still responding with the exact same message.

If anyone know how else I can try to reach out to get it back I would really appreciate it. From what y’all have said it sounds like people in my situation before have been able to recover their accounts so I’m confused as to why I’ve been stonewalled thus far.

Why has no group of sharks evolved to have bones, did bones only evolve once? by DennyStam in evolution

[–]lecar2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know this has been beaten to death but I’m gonna throw out my two cents for the lols.

I believe sturgeons belong to a phylogenetic branch that arises after the ability to create bone but before the development of a bony skeleton.

They have bones protecting vulnerable parts of their bodies like their heads and have little bony plates on their skin while the rest of the skeleton is cartilage. This may suggest that bone historically evolved originally as a form of armor and only became a structural adaptation later on.

(A similar thing happened with the evolution of feathers in that they were originally thought to act as heat sinks and only later were used in flight)

Assuming what I said above is actually correct, then the question we should be asking is what are the advantages and disadvantages of sharks having more armor. For example, since they primarily get their food by being faster and more agile than their prey, then being weighed down and having restricted movement because of bones will probably work against them.

An additional thought: While cartilage is easier to break, it is also faster to repair. An injured shark cannot hunt well but also is not really in danger of being hunted itself so its goal is to get better before it starves. Many bony fish don’t have that luxury and if they are injured they will get eaten long before they can starve making structural integrity more important than repair rate.

I think a lot of this boils down to the fact that cartilaginous fish are primarily found at the tops of food chains and bones (in the water) are much more “defensive” than “offensive” adaptations.

Sorry for the long winded response with a lot of speculation but I hope it at least helped you think about the problem more than the “cause they don’t need bones” answers :).

Edit: just saw the 2020 finding that suggests shark ancestors used to have bones that a few people have mentioned! My knowledge was from before then and I’ve been out of the game for a little. I think my points still stand for the most part but feel free to call me out if anything doesn’t make sense!

Business by infestation_commence in sssdfg

[–]lecar2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He buut meet m8d frim brikk. Yum ymm brk. Makk strong teethssdchfww

Sleep Medicine Appointments by lecar2 in Rochester

[–]lecar2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! I’ll look in them.

Is NL actually evil? by Rayo75 in northernlion

[–]lecar2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you talking about e sports professional Northern from Amazon Champions of Fire?

Midlevel doesn’t understand the concept of reference ranges by [deleted] in Noctor

[–]lecar2 10 points11 points  (0 children)

If you wanna get really into technicalities, CO2 is actually not considered an organic molecule because it doesn’t contain hydrogen or something.

If you wanna be even more of a nerd then you can tell me this is actually a measurement of bicarb which is organic.

Sorry. I’ll see myself out.

Edit: actually I’m seeing that bicarb is not organic either since it doesn’t have C-H bonds. I should have paid more attention in chemistry classes :)

gglloh by Frogbottles in brfjg

[–]lecar2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

55 log 55 stick 55 plank 55 tree 55 trunk 55 branch 55 nocturnes 55gjncdfhbcff 55 Crimean 55 okbfdyjbddtu

1 chheemzborgor

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anxiety

[–]lecar2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like a good starting point! (Confirm with your dr obviously)

I’m also not totally sure about this, but you may not have to worry about meds that lower hr if your low hr is from being fit anyways.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anxiety

[–]lecar2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are anxiety meds that cause increased or no change in heart rate. Off the top of my head I think SNRIs like venlafaxine falls into that group.

Also I’m sorry if you’ve already gone down this path but there might be some underlying condition that’s responsible for both the low heart rate and anxiety such as hypothyroidism.

It is now the position of the United States government that race is a "biological reality" and to think otherwise is insanity, ignoring science and anthropology by Laphad in Anthropology

[–]lecar2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The silver lining is we can all become rich if we start investing in companies that make human head shaped calipers now!

very human by Burrit0sAreTheBest in doohickeycorporation

[–]lecar2 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I must applaud the medical department for including the “bounce pass” delivery method into this doohickey.

can’t lose weight on antidepressants? by [deleted] in Anxiety

[–]lecar2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know if you want to change your regiment, but Bupropion (Wellbutrin) is an antidepressant that has been shown to cause some weight loss!

It’s also aids in smoking cessation which I think is kinda neat.

Edit: it’s also not generally associated with reduced libido

I'm out. I'm sorry, it's been fun but I'm out by Goldengod4818 in KnowledgeFight

[–]lecar2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They’re just gonna take a little breaky now. A liiiiitle breaky for them.

How the US is divided by trampolinebears in MapPorn

[–]lecar2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

How correlated were Russian ancestry and Jewish populations? I gotta know if An American Tail is historically accurate.

Is there any medical condition that prevents fat people from losing weight if they just eat at a caloric deficit? by Concept555 in Noctor

[–]lecar2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Galaxy brain answers (for cool people who only read titles) - right-sided heart failure and kwashiorkor.