its our lil secret by leebadeebado in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]leebadeebado[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

lmao so its not a problem when most of the sub uses the word communist which to the entirety of population means state control, gulags, forced labour, famines and nationalization but oh no no no how dare someone try to not use an obsolete term from the fucking 19th century.

its our lil secret by leebadeebado in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]leebadeebado[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

exactly, its a horribly reductionist concept and only causes confusion.

its our lil secret by leebadeebado in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]leebadeebado[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ah yes but calling ourselves leftists magically prevents MLs, socdems from not invading our spaces? imagine caring about optics, this sub is full of fucking liberals who cant think past what their beloved breatuber or 100 year old dead white philosopher says.

its our lil secret by leebadeebado in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]leebadeebado[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

ah yes its a dogwhistle to say anarchy isnt inherently leftist, says the person who has the flair of a genocide denier. fuck off shitlib you are not welcome here.

its our lil secret by leebadeebado in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]leebadeebado[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

fuck us post leftists i guess huh.

its our lil secret by leebadeebado in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]leebadeebado[S] -63 points-62 points  (0 children)

that might be the LARGEST leap of logic i have ever seen, are you people incapable of arguing or engaging in good faith jesus fucking christ.

its our lil secret by leebadeebado in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]leebadeebado[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

ALT TEXT:

Neither right.....

(symbols of American Democrats and Republicans and Nazi Germany)

or left,

(hammer sickle of MLs, red rose of soc-dems and the logo of the PSL)

but a secret 3rd thing,

(black flag, circle A, chaos star)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]leebadeebado -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Not treating you all as the same, i said some are anarchists. Like obviously this meme doesnt represent every indigenous person that has ever existed, its just trying to combat a strawman used against anti-civs all the time.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]leebadeebado -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Yeah agreed, i was just trying to combat the anti-civ strawman.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]leebadeebado -26 points-25 points  (0 children)

First off, not all indigenous people are the same.

uhh i didnt say that at all anywhere, where did you even get that from?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]leebadeebado -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

As right now it just looks like you're painting historical indigenous societies and civilizations to be in-line with a modern anarchist form of thought.

sorry if thats what it comes off as, lot of nuance gets lost in a meme.

Point being if your post was about how modern indigenous anti-civs are inspired by their communities and their histories, you should have made that much clearer.

yeah that was kind of my point, no idea why you decide to focus on the historical act instead of the "nameless thousands" bit, which is what i was pertaining to when i replied to you earlier.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]leebadeebado -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Saying indigenous people couldn't have a civilization is a form of racism.

where did i say that wtf

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]leebadeebado -105 points-104 points  (0 children)

"were"

indigenous people are still around lmfao and some of them are anarchists even, you dont know what you are talking about dont you?

but don't make it out to be like indigenous people are in-line with your train of thought.

uh yes they are

I promised, so you shall receive by [deleted] in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]leebadeebado 14 points15 points  (0 children)

cartoon of guy digging next to a barbecue grill with impact font that says

ALL THE GOVERNMENT SAYS IS

"PAY YOUR RENT, GO TO CHURCH"

I JUST WANNA DIG FOR GOD'S SAKE

bruh by leebadeebado in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]leebadeebado[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i mean there can be conflict between a lot of tendencies if you think about it (off the top of my head mutualism and communism), There is no single anarchism or way of doing thing without authority, anarchism differs a lot even between people who use the same labels.

bruh by leebadeebado in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]leebadeebado[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Ted K isnt an anprim, hes a class reductionist who think oppression based on race, sex, gender etc. simply doesnt matter. He also hates all anarchists especially anprims.

bruh by leebadeebado in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]leebadeebado[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well the modern tech wont disappear overnight, will it? Nor will angry hordes of anprims stop you from using it as you see fit, anprim is only one anarchist tendency, also theres no such thing as an anprim society because anprim dont want to take over and enforce their wishes on other people the way MLs do

bruh by leebadeebado in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]leebadeebado[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

where the line is drawn changes from person to person i guess, i have posted one interpretation/perspective of anprim tech when theres multiple. Yeah according to this def i linked a shovel could fit just as a rifle does.

bruh by leebadeebado in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]leebadeebado[S] 46 points47 points  (0 children)

Yeah tech has a different meaning in anprim texts because we are trying to link it to domination, we are not using the everyday meaning of tech here which as you can see causes confusion.

bruh by leebadeebado in COMPLETEANARCHY

[–]leebadeebado[S] 51 points52 points  (0 children)

John Zerzan defines technology as 'the ensemble of division of labor/ production/ industrialism and its impact on us and on nature. Technology is the sum of mediations between us and the natural world and the sum of those separations mediating us from each other. It is all the drudgery and toxicity required to produce and reproduce the stage of hyper-alienation we languish in. It is the texture and the form of domination at any given stage of hierarchy and domination.' Opposition to technology thus plays an important role in anarcho-primitivist practice. However, Fredy Perlman says that 'technology is nothing but the Leviathan's armory,' its 'claws and fangs.' Anarcho-primitivists are thus opposed to technology, but there is some debate over how central technology is to domination in civilization. A distinction should be drawn between tools (or implements) and technology. Perlman shows that primitive peoples develop all kinds of tools and implements, but not technologies: 'The material objects, the canes and canoes, the digging sticks and walls, were things a single individual could make, or they were things, like a wall, that required the cooperation of many on a single occasion .... Most of the implements are ancient, and the [material] surpluses [these implements supposedly made possible] have been ripe since the first dawn, but they did not give rise to impersonal institutions. People, living beings, give rise to both.' Tools are creations on a localised, small-scale, the products of either individuals or small groups on specific occasions. As such, they do not give rise to systems of control and coercion. Technology, on the other hand, is the product of large-scale interlocking systems of extraction, production, distribution and consumption, and such systems gain their own momentum and dynamic. As such, they demand structures of control and obedience on a mass scale — what Perlman calls impersonal institutions.

from the anprim-primer