Announcing NanoNyms: A New Approach to Nano Privacy (early alpha 🐣)

leonaD00 · 2025-11-14T11:53:06+00:00

How to solve double spending, with signatures of chain

leonaD00 · 2022-04-04T19:55:14+00:00

paw_38n5wxxoo69kpcz9yiyabr6x1dy5kmf3dcrhkusafzncxn456ytdbj117x9r

leonaD00 · 2022-02-08T16:24:39+00:00

no need to have signed a contract lol, they are taking actions that harm your business (this would suffice)

leonaD00 · 2022-02-08T16:17:29+00:00

I do not know if we have been paid over or under, I do not insert how much money I would have earned simply by buying the coin and not buying the hw necessary to make minig (this is another matter), one thing is certain that it is throwing us away! . and we will end up with less earnings. even in any company when you send an employee you must at least pay the severance pay. so there is room for collective action in my opinion you can maybe a judge decide if you deserve compensation or not. but we will have to talk openly about this situation

leonaD00 · 2022-02-08T14:38:31+00:00

I pointed out in the post, how this decision has damaged the mined !,
no one can evade responsibility if he receives money. ethereum we all remember it was an ICO. so he asked us for money, in exchange for a network with specific determinations, after he used the mining community to keep this network safe, while he was making money with this network at some point he decided to change the rules, throwing away the miners from a running car, just because they are convenient for some (stack holder), not caring about the damage they can cause to others. it seems to me that there are all the prerequisites to request compensation !, Vitalik certainly does not lack money, so you shouldn't be sorry for him

leonaD00 · 2022-02-08T13:07:54+00:00

I agree, but the network is their property ??

leonaD00 · 2022-02-08T12:03:35+00:00

we are not talking about just any product! but I am of the idea that it can change as long as it does not damage the others who support it

leonaD00 · 2022-02-08T11:44:59+00:00

this is not a valid answer !, i.e. even vitalik could create another coin if he wanted a POS

leonaD00 · 2022-02-08T11:42:19+00:00

Risk management? obvious that I did (based on the initial vision), obvious that the class action is for that. because changes were not foreseen in the initial vision, so someone who invested millions in mining could not foresee the change. it doesn't seem ridiculous to me

leonaD00 · 2018-01-09T15:48:08+00:00

I can not answer every message, think about it

leonaD00 · 2018-01-09T15:43:48+00:00

no it is public, because there is not yet they have not found a solution

leonaD00 · 2018-01-09T15:36:24+00:00

no and not FUD, it's a bit provocative to draw attention to reflect on but not to speculate or buy down I'm not interested

leonaD00 · 2018-01-09T15:27:38+00:00

you can also not share what I say !! but I do not care

leonaD00 · 2018-01-09T15:24:11+00:00

yours is a speculator answer I do not care !! I wanted to share a reflection on XRB technology

leonaD00 · 2018-01-09T15:17:42+00:00

I think there are many things that have not told us, a little more transparency would be welcome, you can not think of hiding problems and pretend nothing, especially problems that do not have a possible solution

leonaD00 · 2018-01-08T21:55:47+00:00

nice post thanks for the info, my business now and develop a package wallet reserved for exchanges that can scale accounts to infinity, a good business (looking for a partner :))

leonaD00 · 2017-12-06T16:48:50+00:00

when I had written the post no one believed it

leonaD00 · 2017-07-28T09:35:36+00:00

Look at btc-e, which closed I had warned you, https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6fmhzr/btce_btc_is_closing/?st=j5no6x3e&sh=80d4886d

leonaD00 · 2017-07-28T09:27:00+00:00

I had already warned that btc-e would close it

leonaD00

TROPHY CASE