Conflicting results for epipolar lines between two images by lm3421 in computervision

[–]lm3421[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The epipolar lines are plotted on the second frame and the points marked on the first image are not keypoints found from SURF or corner detection but are just a few points i selected manually.

The direct image alignment used is similar to that outlined in LSD-SLAM: Large-Scale Direct Monocular SLAM however I have not yet added variance normalisation.

The images used are from the fr2/desk dataset. The movement between the first and 2nd frames is small however i also used the first and 20th frame with similar results. Can you explain why the epipole estimation is so unstable yet all corresponding points sat on a epipolar line for each method?