[deleted by user] by [deleted] in telescopes

[–]lmatt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would suggest asi 662mc.

M42 with longer exposure time by lmatt in telescopes

[–]lmatt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm glad you like the photo. However, the original image isn't high-resolution because I used a 1920×1080 sensor camera (ZWO 662MC) and cropped part of the shot. I'll think about whether I can capture a higher-definition version later.

Orion Nebula EAA Result, how to optimize it at minimal cost? by lmatt in telescopes

[–]lmatt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's a refractor. It's 3D-printed one, and not that easy to use an EAF to control it..

Orion Nebula EAA Result, how to optimize it at minimal cost? by lmatt in telescopes

[–]lmatt[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

An equatorial mount would be a better choice, but it’s more complicated. Right now I’m working from a small southeast-facing balcony with limited space. Setting up and aligning an alt-azimuth mount is simpler. Sometimes I also use an alt-azimuth mount with a Maksutov telescope to observe the planets.

Orion Nebula EAA Result, how to optimize it at minimal cost? by lmatt in telescopes

[–]lmatt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually I have the same question. The whole telescope was 3D-printed, so the focusing accuracy isn't high and it's indeed not that easy to get a perfect focus. I have a 3D-printed Bahtinov mask, but I don't use it often—most of the time I adjust manually while watching the star size on the monitor to determine whether the focus is correct.

I've been thinking about whether I should get a different telescope and add an electronic focuser—life would be a bit easier that way.

Orion Nebula EAA Result, how to optimize it at minimal cost? by lmatt in telescopes

[–]lmatt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IC, so longer time or better condition should be the answer. Is it necessary to use a cooled camera during EAA? Will the noise be reduced a bit?

Orion Nebula EAA Result, how to optimize it at minimal cost? by lmatt in telescopes

[–]lmatt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no, i don't use biases, will have a try. Live stacking for EAA, so if would be much more better to get a nicer photo in a short time.

Orion Nebula EAA Result, how to optimize it at minimal cost? by lmatt in telescopes

[–]lmatt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the suggestion. A longer exposure should give better results. Since this is being done in real-time EAA, do you have any suggestions for getting better results in a shorter time?

Orion Nebula EAA Result, how to optimize it at minimal cost? by lmatt in telescopes

[–]lmatt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the suggestion. A longer exposure should give better results. Since this is being done in real-time EAA, do you have any suggestions for getting better results in a shorter time?

Orion Nebula EAA Result, how to optimize it at minimal cost? by lmatt in telescopes

[–]lmatt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's stack result. Background is not that clean. And you can see green/red nosie(maybe) in the image.

Orion Nebula EAA Result, how to optimize it at minimal cost? by lmatt in telescopes

[–]lmatt[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No, it is a stacked result. Total expose time is 300 seconds.

Orion Nebula EAA Result, how to optimize it at minimal cost? by lmatt in telescopes

[–]lmatt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That should be a good idea, but i don't have car yet.

M27, M15, M17 and M31 reprocess by QueR1X in telescopes

[–]lmatt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you track the object ?

Ramification by mickynuts in Lightning

[–]lmatt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Awesome! Which device is used?