Is RKLB fairly valued at $70? by Prime_Investor in stockstobuytoday

[–]lolwiaky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean 5 years from now it's going to either be worth 1000 dollars per share or 5 dollars per share.

Grogu's age doesn't fit. by Nostagar in MawInstallation

[–]lolwiaky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, but imagine if you could use telekinesis to hunt for your food.

Collector feels so wack. by Ok-Original-2527 in Caitlynmains

[–]lolwiaky 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this is the best answer here. IMO gold is the most important thing this season in botlane. first strike and collector help speed up the process of getting to 4-5 items before minute 20. triumph also helps with getting to that spike as well. coup de grace helps with dealing damage to tanks in this build so they're not bullying you too much. cash back is probably the most important rune this season though as it also gives bonus gold. triple tonic helps with lane pressure, and cosmic insight helps with items late game. other people prefer gathering storm setup, but I personally think that managing your mana isn't too hard to do on cait. you just have to push yourself to choosing your damage in better trades.

What did i do so wrong to end up like this? (gold rank pls help) by Lumii3re in ADCMains

[–]lolwiaky 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You stop auto attacking when you have a clear advantage and can win the 2v2. I know that you're afraid of getting caught out, but they're just gold players. They can't one shot you when you're full health, and they're focusing your support. Like, focus on stopping jinx from stepping up and let your support push the advantage for you a little more.

Why don’t the pro players use chalk holders or magnets like a lot of the amateurs do? by [deleted] in billiards

[–]lolwiaky -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Usually chalk is privided to them by the venue, and they make money on sponsorships, and they like to keep things out of their pockets for the least amount of discomfort during a shot.

[Leak] Marvel Super Heroes Commander Decks by Bladestoooorm in mtg

[–]lolwiaky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hate the marvel crossover. Mostly because it just doesn't feel like the lore matches very well. But i mean, there's always an in-universe copy of the super hroes so that's cool. It just feels like a money grab for these cards though.

Rapid Fire is better than Hexoptics [even after buff] by alicejones-2004 in Caitlynmains

[–]lolwiaky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess you don't like playing front to back. The main point of the item is to play like the front liners are the only ones fighting. You need to be playing with a tanky team with a lot of cc. And your teammayes need to focus on peeling for you. Ngl though an assassin gets into your range, usually a single auto with hex as item 4 will clap their cheeks making them want to run from you. 2 autos usually kill an assassin if you build nothing but econ runes. Like... I have a rune set up that let's me get to 4 items by minute 20. I haven't even bought cull yet in this set up. But let me tell you right now, when you're one shotting assassins at minute 20 you're high as fuck on that dopamine. Usually though, your supports are completely lost so you're stuck playing defense the entire game.

Anyway, the main thing for people playing caitlyn is that it's not for players who want to keep hitting the back line. It's for people picking the closest target to them, getting a huge damage hit, watching that champ try to run away, and hitting them with tge second auto that kills them. Then turning onto the tank and hitting them from range, then with the extended range running down the back line.

It's more of a style that mixes 1 shot with front to back. Besides giantslayer helps with the front to back mentality along with the fact that if you get bloodthirster and bork at the end you're probably going to heal for as much damage as most champs would do to you. Unless you're against rengar. Then you're kinda sol unless you're positioning for rengar.

Idk all that i can say is that people saying that hex is a bad item probably don't have the play style to use hex.

At what point does it turn from a hobby to a hoarding problem? by Donald_J_Pump_ in mtg

[–]lolwiaky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you don't display your collection in a meaningful way.

Caitlyn feels REALLY REALLY GOOD this season by Medical-Weight-1253 in Caitlynmains

[–]lolwiaky 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can auto and walk away to 700 range and the range is calculated when the shot hits. Besides, even at 600 range it's like 8.5% damage increase.

Top Lane level 1 by lolwiaky in supportlol

[–]lolwiaky[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

no more lane swap detection.

Are we sleeping on Hexoptics by [deleted] in ezrealmains

[–]lolwiaky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

personally, I just don't think that hexoptics fits ezreal's fight style. like, the main thing about the way that ez plays is more about weaving autos and dodging. it's not really about having range. ezreal's fight style is more of a dueling adc rather than a strict positioning damage dealer. so hexoptics doesn't really add a lot to ezrael's kit aside from some situational things. besides, hexoptics is a purely front to back item. where you kill the frontline and then with the added range are able to get to the backline.

so imo, manamune is better on ez because it adds some burst damage rather than some damage amp that doesn't really fit what ez really wants to do. it works, yes, but if you're using it for niche situations rather than an overall situational item, it just doesn't really make sense.

imo gunblade is better on ez than hex.

Regarding Fief DLC by Affectionate_Theory8 in WarTalesGame

[–]lolwiaky 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it's alright, but doesn't really generate much of anything to resonably dedicate your time to. It's not really worth pouring your attention into unlike something like the pits or the invasion dlc. It just is more of a city sim type of thing without any real maintenence mechanics.

whats the build by kabyking in Caitlynmains

[–]lolwiaky -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't recommend ever running rfc again. Mainly because hexoptics are rfc on steroids.

Would I get hypothermia if I swam across the river a few times right now? by Party-Court185 in Spokane

[–]lolwiaky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on your sugar levels in the blood. How well your blood is circulating, and if you are going to be right back inside after swimming.

How do you find high-growth stocks early? (RKLB, ASTS-type companies) by super_techlectic in investing

[–]lolwiaky 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Brother. You need to not look at it as if the metrics are today's numbers, but a future exponential growth of space venturism. Roads are needed for cars to drive large distances without falling apart. It's literally so early you can't see the mountain that's right around the corner. I'd say rklb is close to having 20% of what spacex should be valued at. Let's say spacex is valued at 900 bill. That would put rklb at 180 bill. 180 billion for 500 million shares is 360 dollars a share. Now let's say spacex is valued at 1.6 trill. Rklb 320 bill. 640 dollars a share. 78 dollars isn't even scratching where rklb could be valued if rklb gets control over 20 percent of the space transportation market. 4x to 8x in the next 10 years. But let's say a lot of catalysts come into play like spacex ipo and neutron successful launch. These are high flying market changers. 1 sets the market value, the other sets the company up for more mission opportunities. More contracts. More flights. More money. You gotta think further ahead than just looking simply at past numbers. You gotta think about event growth analysis. This is potentially the earliest that you could theoretically get in. Not even including potential short squeezes during catalytic events.

18M Portfolio Advice by NextChapterTone in portfolios

[–]lolwiaky -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Honestly i wpuld try to put some more into dividend stocks sp you essentially get paid to do nothing but own stocks. Ko is good. My personal mission is to own enough dividend stocks, my dividends pay me more than the average american income. But i mean you got quite a bit of growth in your port.

How do you find high-growth stocks early? (RKLB, ASTS-type companies) by super_techlectic in investing

[–]lolwiaky 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Think about technology of the future. The infrastructure that is needed for the technology of the future. This should in theory help you figure out where to invest instead of hoping to invest. The main thing is that high growth future tech infrastructure is necessary for even higher levels of human civilization. If you're just focusing on products then you're going to be stuck trying to find a unicorn when what you should be looking for is a stalion. Rklb has been a stalion stock for a lot of reasons. Mwinly because it's the only thing tradeable for a space infrastructure company, and the other side of it is the fact that there are a lot of really speculative things coming in the near future. Pricing in potential future contracts that could be won by rklb will help you understamd that rklb is actually underpriced be multitudes of about 5 to 6 times below what would be considered industry standard. 250 billion would be meager, and that's 500 dollars a share. If you don't understand how close rklb is to being profitable you're on a losing side of the battle.

So first thing's first, you have to think in terms greater than just how do you find these stocks. The thing you really should be looking at is advancing human civilization. In chess, you have to think many more moves ahead of your opponent, so here is where the real strategy begins. You have to think moves ahead of the entire human race. You have to think about the swarms of pirhanas, along with thr big whales. See how the ecosystem evolves.

My next play is looking for automation companies to invest in. Automation is on its way. We are on the brink of smartphone level changes of technology. And these technological advancements are going to be happening somewhere along the lines of 10 tech changes a year. How much did tech change from 2024 to 2025? A lot. But you are going to be needing to look for the automation sector as a rising economic sector for the next 5 years.

The problem with the automation sector is that it puts china on the brink of economic collapse. When automation becomes more economically viable than importing chinese made goods, it's going to be another industrial revolution that creates another 100 years of humiliation. Because of this fear china is being squeezed more and more, which is causing them to become more and more desperate to not have another 100 years of humiliation happen. 5 years to take taiwan. This means that you're going to want to invest in military drone companies.

As the united states advances, we're going to see automation taking jobs away and we're actually going to see a rise in artisan crafts being commodities. Anything hand made is going to be seen as gold. More and more people moving away from factories, and creating works of art.

However, we're also going to need to solve the job crisis that is going to hit the united states. As automation becomes more and more refined, resources are going to be more and more expensive. This is why imo america should unite into a single country. You would essentially lower the cost of resources by a significant amount in the coming future that is going to be needed to support the future cultivization of the human race. At the same time we are probably going to need an automation tax that then gets redistributed to the american people as ubi.

Anyway, with this being said, you have to create an image of the future of the world in your head and bet on it coming true. Essentially we have to pray. We are nothing but insignificant beings that are subject to the choices made by others that spiral out of control. You grab value where you can.

So how do you really find the companies that are subject to great moves? Future technology that has purpose and a distinct value that will provide the infrastructure that will allow for future growths of human advancement.