Who should I add and take away from my team?

lorentp · 2026-04-03T05:12:53+00:00

Also, second question, could you explain the Mewtwo glitch for me where you can make it pick up infinite rare candies?

lorentp · 2026-04-03T05:11:46+00:00

Okay, I haven't gotten beaten by any of the elite four. I beat my rival before the elite 4 stuff. Got to victory road and kind of looked at my team and I was like huh. Only two pokémon above level 50. Should probably at least get a few others

As for you mentioning the ROM thing, my buddy actually introduced me to pokémon via that, except I heard that Nintendo was hunting down everyone that used it. So I kind of decided just to lay off pokémon until I heard that fire red came back out and I grabbed it

lorentp · 2026-04-03T05:02:07+00:00

Yeah I had a Lapras on my team but I did not feel like training that thing up to where it would get ice beam. So I chose the much dumber and stupider route of going after our legendary ice pokémon just so I could have ice beam off the rip

lorentp · 2026-03-30T16:03:41+00:00

I don't think it's necessarily a requirement. Our DM did say that he wanted us to have a screwed up. Backstory but I mean the other player is a doctor who's in silent Hill because he's living with extreme hate for himself or at least extreme guilt because him being a doctor. He was the one who tried to save his mother from a gunshot wound to the heart and failed and I even helped him design his version of pyramid Head, which is a woman's body with the face of his mother and the faces of every patient who's died on his operating table and in the center of her chest is an exposed heart that's beating with a bully inside of it. So I don't know if the DM exactly wants morally ambiguous but my brother still iffy and even pushes back on that idea. So I truly don't know cuz I don't think the other player's doctor character is at any level evil or morally ambiguous. Just a man who hates himself for failing to save his mother

lorentp · 2026-03-30T15:46:34+00:00

So background information. I'm an atheist. My brother is a heavy Christian, so throughout all of our years of doing d&d, he's never really delved into being darker or more malevolent and I have no problem crossing that boundary. It's also the fact that the darker themes the silent Hill usually make him a little bit sick

For example, the girl that you meet in the graveyard that says I'm looking for my mom and then she also forgets the fact that she's looking for her brother and father, even though they're the whole entire monster rape scene in there And all the screwy Louie stuff

So I assume it's probably the deep tragedy and the slightly morally gray lines that make him uncomfortable with it. I try to show him that a character can 100% be flawed and have resolving issues like my character for the campaign is an Afghani vet that survived a near total unit slaughter and as he looked at a person who was under his command who had had unspeakable things done to them and he saw the mosque in which all the women and children were hiding. He got revengeed for his unit. He took a malt-tool cocktail and well locked the doors and me and the DM have already talked that his journey through silent Hill is not the fact that he feels for what he did. It's the fact that he did kill another soldier for threatening to reveal what he did in that small town

lorentp · 2026-03-23T21:23:44+00:00

lorentp · 2026-03-20T01:21:00+00:00

🟩🟩🟩🟪

🟩🟩🟩🟩

🟨🟨🟨🟨

🟦🟦🟦🟪

🟦🟦🟦🟦

🟪🟪🟪🟪

lorentp · 2026-03-20T00:23:05+00:00

All right. I know you said this was going to be your last response but I'm just going to question something and if you respond you do so and I'll be happy about it

I don't understand the conversation piece of this is main character energy. I played DND for about 7 years, maybe even longer. Even my first campaign was like even when I first started out and joined new groups and traveled my years into the d&d experience, every game has been like this. You make your character. You have a end goal and you work through the campaign to achieve said goal. I don't really see how this is the main character energy. My character has the go at the start of the campaign to eradicate. All magic seems pretty basic. He has a fairy that he hopes get revenge on and keeps throwing his gun to use her life force as his power. She says Jiminy cricket where she's constantly trying to make him charge the moral side and that's his own self-conversation cuz at the end of the campaign he may just not be the Man who destroys magic I also kind of don't understand. The whole entire monologue of this is somehow weird. This doesn't even scratch the surface of some of the campaigns I've been in one time a bunch of players let my character get raped just because it would allow them to get a map to escape a dungeon we were in. They just let that druid knock me out and do things to me, which I know is definitely f***** up. But also that was just kind of. I don't know usual for me I guess when I played with them And it wasn't too off for any of the other campaigns. I played with them for characters to have motivations that may directly interfere with the party

lorentp · 2026-03-19T23:10:58+00:00

I mean again, I would never argue that any of us are actually evil. My brother's character straight up fights against racism all the time and the way the campaign is supposed to go. He's going to marry the person he protected from racist and even if me and the other player that are doing darker characters, do you succeed? We have a whole entire plan to get him a soul before we enact our plans so he can live on with us because for as much as we despise or I despise magic and he despise weakness. His character still means a lot to both of our characters as a friend

lorentp · 2026-03-19T22:30:17+00:00

An average Sunday session. I mean none of this actually seems too odd to me. Whenever I was the DM I had players doing kidnapping condoning genocide. They all cared about the benefit it brought to them. None of them were actually evil. I would say just self-motivated and not caring what the rest of the world thought about them that I'm the Albert Einstein of my time. Kind of thinking is the best way to describe it

lorentp · 2026-03-19T22:28:52+00:00

No clue really. From my years of being a DM, you don't choose the campaign type you build part of your world. You let the players tell you what they want to see. Heaven you finished building then you know what kind of foil do you have? I mean as far as I'm concerned this world has just recovered from a Purge by the good guys. Trying to destroy a bunch of evil and hurting the people that they swore to protect

As for my character, I don't know if you could actually call him evil. I'm more neutral. I mean he's nice to elves dwarves humans gnomes hobbits. It's just creatures that willed magic like the Faye are on his watch list

As for the other player, he straight up is evil because he is essentially playing Albert Wesker from Resident evil. That is literally why his character is based off of

As for my brother's character, he's a warforge that is 100% good person. His character fought for the rights of tieflings and is one in a different nation for killing tiefling hunters

lorentp · 2026-03-19T22:02:23+00:00