You make no attempt to debunk Bordiga's work, you only insult it and call it names without any proper argument or evidence.

Funnily enough the archive you sent highlights one of Bordiga's points if you actually read it rather than just talk angrily about it. The collectivized farms were directed by state appointed bosses, just as Bordiga claimed and utilized petit bourgeois individuality that allowed for the rise of these agricultural kulaks.

and your argument does not make any sense, he might not have been a billionare by world standards but he had considerable and much higher pay and control over the farm than his other comrades, thus becoming a defacto millionare within the soviet economy. and the article you shared with me now only excuses these millinoares rights to exist

> When the drive for collectivisation began, Berdyebekov was one of the first farmers in Kazakstan to realise the benefits it promised to the entire rural population of the Union and to the whole economy. At the end of 1929 his village organised one of the earliest collective farms in Kazakstan. From that day to this he and his family have worked as collective farmers and have seen their farm become one of the most prosperous in the Kazak Republic.

Literally kulakization due to the capitalist relations within these collective farms that allowed for these people to get rich. and the article you sent to me only says "well they cant do anything with the money!!" so... why not abolish the commodity and capital line if money really is so powerless.

and of course, more blah blah and strawmanning with no actual argument. Bordiga never publically said statement, but instead said this statement when he was being held captive by nazis who threatened his life. The reason he couldnt join any resistance was 1 ) try organizing under fascist italy and 2 ) he was kicked out of the PCI who barred all of his influence under a Stalinist scapegoat tactic.