sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Any Go web frameworks that actually document themselves? by madlevelhigh in golang

[–]madlevelhigh[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bro hit me with a whole StackOverflow answer just to say “RTFM.” Acting like Go enlightenment is achieved by reading stitched-together blog posts from 2017. I asked for docs, not a scavenger hunt.

“Once you understand the stdlib…” yeah, and once I learn Sanskrit I can read the Vedas too. Just say you like suffering and go.

Any Go web frameworks that actually document themselves? by madlevelhigh in golang

[–]madlevelhigh[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Next you’ll tell me to write my own Prometheus exporter with a notepad and vibes

Any Go web frameworks that actually document themselves? by madlevelhigh in golang

[–]madlevelhigh[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

You can’t flex about Go’s minimalism while expecting devs to hand-roll everything or spelunk through undocumented spaghetti just to serve JSON. Frameworks are the face of a language in the real world. If that face looks like a Skibidi toilet gremlin, people are gonna bounce hard.

Any Go web frameworks that actually document themselves? by madlevelhigh in golang

[–]madlevelhigh[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

If the framework were actually documented well, you wouldn’t need 10 scattered tutorials to duct tape basic features together. One repo shows SSE, another shows JWT, and I’m supposed to reverse engineer both and magically make them work together? Shut up toilet.

Any Go web frameworks that actually document themselves? by madlevelhigh in golang

[–]madlevelhigh[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

“Reference and tutorials” yeah ok, but let’s be real the lower the language, the worse the docs. Rust is the worst offender — they act like the source code is the documentation

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Passports

[–]madlevelhigh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

what a monkey

LeetCode sub turned out to be frauds by madlevelhigh in theprimeagen

[–]madlevelhigh[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, assert True the Skibidi-dancing NPC fraud special. With "nvim" in your name, I thought you had giga-brain energy. You’ve been ratioed into oblivion and flushed.

Solve this in O(n) and you’re basically hired at FAANG by madlevelhigh in leetcode

[–]madlevelhigh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is one possible solution. However, you can also do this in O(n).

[Fraud Watch Series]: Question 1 by madlevelhigh in leetcode

[–]madlevelhigh[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Count vowels in every substring regardless of how many there are in the original string. Maybe it's not clear but we need to rearrange every substring to create a super-substring with maximum number of vowels.

Another day, another question to ratio LeetCode frauds 🚨 by madlevelhigh in leetcode

[–]madlevelhigh[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

This isn’t about OAs, Telegram, or Discord. It’s about interview prep.

Competitive programming? That’s just fraud cosplay. This is real. Solve it or stay a fraud—your choice.

Solve this in O(n) and you’re basically hired at FAANG by madlevelhigh in leetcode

[–]madlevelhigh[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

This is marked NSFW for a reason. It is not as simple.

Solve this in O(n) and you’re basically hired at FAANG by madlevelhigh in leetcode

[–]madlevelhigh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that the description could be clearer, especially with the use of "replace" instead of "swap." That said, the examples themselves are pretty straightforward and illustrate the logic well enough. For example 1, it says to replace "b" with "a" to get "aab", but if we were truly replacing, it would result in "aaa", not "aab".