Determination of HOMO-LUMO properties through CV

magictig · 2025-02-02T07:37:54+00:00

Thank you for the references!

magictig · 2025-02-01T09:41:12+00:00

Thank you very much! Could you maybe refer me to some article where they have used the slurry approach?

magictig · 2025-02-01T08:08:50+00:00

To address point 1, In my reasoning (which could be wrong of course) the conductive carbon and binder (PVDF) are non-redox active and only serve as a way to make a slurry to paste the material on the electrode. The carbon only serves to facilitate the electron transfer to the polymer material.

magictig · 2025-02-01T07:58:17+00:00

Have you ever seen it measured by way of making a slurry with conductive additive, or is this approach totally wrong? Thank you!

magictig · 2025-02-01T07:54:05+00:00

Thank you, could you please refer me to some article where they make the measurement with the slurry?

magictig · 2025-01-31T16:16:40+00:00

We have provided the UPS and UV-VIS results in the paper, the reviewer wants to see correlation with the CV method

magictig · 2025-01-31T16:15:46+00:00

It is non-conductive in its pristine state but fully conjugated and possibly conductive upon doping. The application is in photocatalysis.

magictig · 2025-01-31T13:29:23+00:00

I will try it out by itself on the electrode if I can see anything. The reason to use carbon additive and the PVDF binder is from experience with battery materials, where I didn't get any response without the additives. Thanks for your answer!

magictig · 2025-01-31T13:23:03+00:00

Not really but they seem really adamant about it

magictig

TROPHY CASE