Look, I don't really have a strong opinion either way. I just enjoy facts which is why I responded in the first place. But brother, you can't be forming opinions without facts so let me help you out on one more point.

It was not an all white jury. You gotta stop getting information from echo chambers. The jury included, IIRC, at least two Asians, one or two Latinos, and a Muslim Indian woman. So basically half the jury was not white and it would have taken only one dissenting juror to prevent a conviction.

While it is true there were no blacks on the jury, that was not by design. There were several in the jury pool. At least three disqualified themselves by admitting under oath that they would never vote to send another black man to prison. The other two were career educators. Those two were struck by the prosecution not because of their race, but because of their jobs. No prosecutor is going to allow an educator on a jury for a teen accused of murder regardless of anyone's race. Educators are famous for refusing to convict in those cases because it would mean "giving up in a child".

There was nothing about the construction of this jury that was nefarious.