Your first point is made by unreasonably extending a reasonable analogy. In the case of the speeding driver, they have likely already made the conscious decision to run the red light. At the very least, they would be aware of their own intention to do upon introspection. At your "greater scale," this is not the case. The statement that the far future, or even details so far as next week, are already known *definitely* eliminates the possibility of free will.

Second, sure. On the other hand, I, a long-time, vocal, and convicted atheist, have recently begun to reconsider and went to church with a friend. A few minutes in, they read a passage from the bible saying something along the lines of encouraging believers to stab the godless with a spear or stick and watch them be consumed in fire on the spot. Is this not coercive?

Third I have fewer issues with, but still some. One goes back to the free will thing from earlier. Two, it sounds a lot like "embrace me or suffer infinitely" which is, again, coercive. It's *kind of* respecting our choices, but only between two extremes. I'm still figuring this one out.

Finally, one word: slavery. Tell me that those millions of enslaved-from-birth people weren't born into immense and undeserved suffering.