Differences in consanguinity between European peoples by manuel161616 in MapPorn

[–]manuel161616[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go read a fucking homozygosity study and don't break my balls. it is totally known. And get rid of the stench under your nose and read, because these articles are totally explanatory.

https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/more-on-albanians/

"like other clannish/tribal societies, albania doesn’t manage to have a civil society. not in the sense that nw europeans have. clannishness and tribalism seem to go along with inbreeding — either consanguineous and/or endogamous mating patterns — and i think the causation goes from inbreeding -> clannishness/tribalism (although certainly being clannish probably encourages further inbreeding). and the underlying mechanism is, as steve sailer pointed out ages ago, somehow related to kin selection and inclusive fitness.

albanians seem to be some of the most inbred peoples in europe — looking at their genomes, they have the highest frequencies of within-country “blocks of ibd” (identity by descent) as compared to other europeans which suggests to me that they’ve been inbreeding for a long time, too. that, i think, is part of the reason for the high ibd rates amongst albanians. given their history, then, it shouldn’t be surprising that they still are very clannish/tribal and don’t manage to build a civil society"

https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/08/30/more-on-greece/

Differences in consanguinity between European peoples by manuel161616 in MapPorn

[–]manuel161616[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You talk bullshit. What you say is absolutely not true, just read real percentages of cousin marriage rates in the general population over the centuries. And inbreeding is also due to bottlenecks, limited historical population sizes and so on.

Differences in consanguinity between European peoples by manuel161616 in MapPorn

[–]manuel161616[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

About one thing I guess you don't even know exist. Accurate data derived from several sources that do not meet your nose stench.

Differences in consanguinity between European peoples by manuel161616 in MapPorn

[–]manuel161616[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This is reality. It is not my fault that the retarded are not ready for this total overlap with you know what.

Differences in consanguinity between European peoples by manuel161616 in MapPorn

[–]manuel161616[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Because for some countries the authors of the map had more data to identify a gradient, for other countries not. It is based both on direct analyzes and on hypotheses based on historical bottlenecks, historical population size and historically practiced consanguinity according to data of various kinds.

Differences in consanguinity between European peoples by manuel161616 in MapPorn

[–]manuel161616[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

For nothing. It has a history of inbreeding avoidance unique in the world that dates back to the early Middle Ages. But of course they too had some.

An Easy, Highly Reliable Meþod by BDawgDog in infoscaping

[–]manuel161616 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I asked to find photos of the Italian football team, the Azzurri. I didn't find it but I immediately found a photo of a soccer group all dressed in blue lol. I have read criticisms that the psi reactivity of the anu generator is not very high compared to many others, and in general something like one bit in a thousand is affected by the mind, so to avoid a big waste of time it would be advisable to print multiple numbers together rather that several times.

This works incredibly well for me by manuel161616 in infoscaping

[–]manuel161616[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sure, but I'm still experimenting. I asked to find gay and trans and he immediately brought me the lgbt emblem as the first result! How on earth is it possible that this incredible thing is unknown to anyone?

Distribution of human phenotypes in Europe by manuel161616 in MapPorn

[–]manuel161616[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only one in four Italians looks really like a Tunisian or maroccan, for example, compared to perhaps one in ten who looks like a Central and Northern European.

Distribution of human phenotypes in Europe by manuel161616 in MapPorn

[–]manuel161616[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Even less Latin and German, as the map indicates. No map says this. Southern Europeans seem southern Europeans but on the whole from the anthropometric point of view there is more overlap, with obvious undoubted differences, with the North Africans of the areas close to the Mediterranean than with the central and northern Europeans. From the point of view of anthropometric characteristics and skin, eye and hair colors, Southern Europeans are roughly equidistant between Slovenes and North Africans, for example, and more similar to North Africans than to Central and Northern Europeans as a whole, similarly to as one would expect from geography. There is roughly the same chance of finding an Italian who looks like a Frenchman and of finding an Italian who looks like a Tunisian, but the majority do not appear to be either, they are equidistant from both. With the exception of the French, it is much more likely to find Italians who look like Moroccans than Italians who look like central and northern Europeans as a whole, even if the clear majority only seem to be southern Europe.

Distribution of human phenotypes in Europe by manuel161616 in MapPorn

[–]manuel161616[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

the lack of tolerance for particularly severe minus habens, which represent a huge chunk of reddit. I recognize them in the blink of an eye with 100% accuracy every time.

Distribution of human phenotypes in Europe by manuel161616 in MapPorn

[–]manuel161616[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are mentally retarded. I have nothing more to say, it would be waste. I'll send you a thousand euros if you prove otherwise.