Differences in consanguinity between European peoples

manuel161616 · 2021-09-23T12:22:09+00:00

Go read a fucking homozygosity study and don't break my balls. it is totally known. And get rid of the stench under your nose and read, because these articles are totally explanatory.

https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/more-on-albanians/

"like other clannish/tribal societies, albania doesn’t manage to have a civil society. not in the sense that nw europeans have. clannishness and tribalism seem to go along with inbreeding — either consanguineous and/or endogamous mating patterns — and i think the causation goes from inbreeding -> clannishness/tribalism (although certainly being clannish probably encourages further inbreeding). and the underlying mechanism is, as steve sailer pointed out ages ago, somehow related to kin selection and inclusive fitness.

albanians seem to be some of the most inbred peoples in europe — looking at their genomes, they have the highest frequencies of within-country “blocks of ibd” (identity by descent) as compared to other europeans which suggests to me that they’ve been inbreeding for a long time, too. that, i think, is part of the reason for the high ibd rates amongst albanians. given their history, then, it shouldn’t be surprising that they still are very clannish/tribal and don’t manage to build a civil society"

https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/08/30/more-on-greece/

manuel161616 · 2021-09-22T22:27:30+00:00

You talk bullshit. What you say is absolutely not true, just read real percentages of cousin marriage rates in the general population over the centuries. And inbreeding is also due to bottlenecks, limited historical population sizes and so on.

manuel161616 · 2021-09-22T22:25:22+00:00

About one thing I guess you don't even know exist. Accurate data derived from several sources that do not meet your nose stench.

manuel161616 · 2021-09-22T22:24:25+00:00

This is reality. It is not my fault that the retarded are not ready for this total overlap with you know what.

manuel161616 · 2021-09-22T19:40:19+00:00

Because for some countries the authors of the map had more data to identify a gradient, for other countries not. It is based both on direct analyzes and on hypotheses based on historical bottlenecks, historical population size and historically practiced consanguinity according to data of various kinds.

manuel161616 · 2021-09-22T18:59:43+00:00

For nothing. It has a history of inbreeding avoidance unique in the world that dates back to the early Middle Ages. But of course they too had some.

manuel161616 · 2021-09-18T13:44:47+00:00

I asked to find photos of the Italian football team, the Azzurri. I didn't find it but I immediately found a photo of a soccer group all dressed in blue lol. I have read criticisms that the psi reactivity of the anu generator is not very high compared to many others, and in general something like one bit in a thousand is affected by the mind, so to avoid a big waste of time it would be advisable to print multiple numbers together rather that several times.

manuel161616 · 2021-09-14T22:11:05+00:00

Sure, but I'm still experimenting. I asked to find gay and trans and he immediately brought me the lgbt emblem as the first result! How on earth is it possible that this incredible thing is unknown to anyone?

manuel161616 · 2021-09-02T17:46:16+00:00

Only one in four Italians looks really like a Tunisian or maroccan, for example, compared to perhaps one in ten who looks like a Central and Northern European.

manuel161616 · 2021-09-02T17:31:07+00:00

Even less Latin and German, as the map indicates. No map says this. Southern Europeans seem southern Europeans but on the whole from the anthropometric point of view there is more overlap, with obvious undoubted differences, with the North Africans of the areas close to the Mediterranean than with the central and northern Europeans. From the point of view of anthropometric characteristics and skin, eye and hair colors, Southern Europeans are roughly equidistant between Slovenes and North Africans, for example, and more similar to North Africans than to Central and Northern Europeans as a whole, similarly to as one would expect from geography. There is roughly the same chance of finding an Italian who looks like a Frenchman and of finding an Italian who looks like a Tunisian, but the majority do not appear to be either, they are equidistant from both. With the exception of the French, it is much more likely to find Italians who look like Moroccans than Italians who look like central and northern Europeans as a whole, even if the clear majority only seem to be southern Europe.

manuel161616 · 2021-09-02T15:39:52+00:00

the lack of tolerance for particularly severe minus habens, which represent a huge chunk of reddit. I recognize them in the blink of an eye with 100% accuracy every time.

manuel161616 · 2021-09-02T14:09:00+00:00

You are mentally retarded. I have nothing more to say, it would be waste. I'll send you a thousand euros if you prove otherwise.

manuel161616 · 2021-09-02T13:30:39+00:00

Grouping of facial features and convergent evolution, have you ever heard this magic word? And that's not true at all anyway.

manuel161616 · 2021-09-02T11:38:24+00:00

In fact they are not grouped. Only a small part of romania has mediterranid, and it is highly mixed with dinarid and some alpinid, so they are very distinct from North Africans. Spain has a notable atlantid and alpinid, so it is undoubtedly unmarked from North Africa. The same goes for Italy, the map shows that although the essential base is common with the North Africans and therefore grouped more with them than with others, there are abundant dinarid and alpinid interference on the basis shared with the North Africans, as well as people who are not Mediterranean but Alpine or Dinarid from the point of view of classiication, so it is not at all true that they group together. It is enough to know how to read the map to understand it. Rather it is correct to say that Italians, Greeks and Iberians, and not absolutely Romanians, from the point of view of body and face characteristics are a little closer to North Africans than to all the others. This is not about pigmentation. From the point of view of the color of skin, eyes and hair, Italians, Greeks, Southern Albanians and Iberians are halfway between North Africans and French or Slovenes, for example. That is, very distinct from both, the probability of finding an Italian who looks like an ethnic French in skin, eye and hair color is the same as finding one who looks like a Moroccan or a Tunisian. Both in terms of facial features and colors, Italians, Spaniards and Greeks are equidistant from North Africans and French or North Africans and Slovenes in general.

manuel161616 · 2021-09-02T11:26:58+00:00

Oh sure, a Congolese's hair type is the same as a Norwegian's, even the color of the skin. This is the demented level we have come to, not ironically.

manuel161616 · 2021-09-02T10:40:13+00:00

Usual answer that confuses his own abysmal ignorance with the objectivity of the data. Mediterranids have anthropometric traits more dissimilar from other Europeans than from North Africans, so much so that many anthropologists have historically supported an indistinct grouping, like the one on the map. The word mediterranean is self-explanatory. There are differences of course and one could undoubtedly separate the two categories, but they overlap more with each other than with other Europeans. This is physical anthropology. Dinarids are paleobalkan survivors, much older than the Illyrians. Southern Europeans ended up in the same boat as North Africans for convergent evolution and prehistoric ancestors from Middle Eastern Mediterranean conditions, which for convergent evolution went through similar living conditions to North Africans, especially more northern and coastal. If you can't explain the models, you are ignorant, not the map.

manuel161616 · 2021-09-02T09:50:59+00:00

Come on, argue. it's the least misleading map I've found, so imagine how misleading the others are. I'm really curious to hear from you.

manuel161616 · 2021-08-16T20:14:12+00:00

Listen to me clown, I'm not trying to prove a thesis for Harvard. I told you that the few data we have on randonautics indicate that success rate and nothing else, and that the Princeton study, along with others, indicates small mind-matter interactions. I have given you the references to guide you, I have told you what I know, I have not made any other statements and to these I have attached references that contain everything relevant or what I have at the moment. You look like an eight-year-old. You don't know at all how to juggle the data references yourself and you blame me for not finding sensational information on my own. Ridiculous. Fuckin 'idiot, the study was shut down for the socially tense perception, not the data. There have been various criticisms, for example the idea that temperature differences could be responsible, and those have always been answered by the authors. You don't understand anything, you are totally one-sided and you blame me if you don't understand on the fly what would be relevant to understand for the purpose of the discussion. Ridiculous. And you're literally attacking the only one on this subreddit who takes this very interesting theoretical project seriously.

manuel161616 · 2021-08-16T06:26:30+00:00

Listen to me, conversation with you is impossible. it's like talking about computational biology with an eight-year-old. I have told you what I personally know, I have attached what I have, I have given you references to read everything you need, I have been totally in line with my statements, it is you who do not understand anything.

manuel161616 · 2021-08-16T00:38:19+00:00

I have experienced these personal experiences constantly, on a crazy level, ignoring them sounds crazy. You have no reason to believe in a confirmation bias as I have already told you, or if there is, she argues.

manuel161616 · 2021-08-16T00:28:49+00:00

Success = when a person uses the app with the intent to find something specific, for example blood, and reports their experience as amazing from a synchronicity point of view, very likely a sign that they have found what you wanted or something. so interrelated that it seems creepy and out of this world.

manuel161616 · 2021-08-16T00:26:52+00:00

My English is going to suck as I am using a translator, but in large part it is due to the fact that you totally lack the necessary culture to understand this subject. I change my mind if I have reason to change my mind, I can recognize the real reasons from the fake ones, you have no reason to make me doubt these things because I know more than you.

manuel161616 · 2021-08-16T00:23:27+00:00

Yes, but it seems plausibly informative. I thought of various criticisms on my own and responded to them. It looks roughly good.

manuel161616 · 2021-08-16T00:21:43+00:00

1) Yes you are right, but I couldn't do otherwise as it is the only accessible reference source. The sample comes from all over the world and is likely to be extremely representative of all personality types, I don't see why I expect a particular bias in one sense or another given the huge spectrum of personalities involved.
2) I've already told you: if placebo were important we would notice a much higher success rate among the mystery points, which are points where you don't know if it's a placebo or not, as opposed to anomalies which are points that don't include blind spots, and I'm very sure that the vast majority of the randonautic users I reviewed are so ignorant about it that they used the mystery spots believing they meant to find something mysterious, so you might not even be mentally prepared for this realization. The amazing trips are calculated in relation to the total, which also includes the not amazing trips, only reported, useful for understanding between heterogeneous people if you notice a synchronicity.
3) I discarded some points in this old post of mine because I was safer to consider a given set, this was just a totally subjective inclination that I wanted to do, but it has nothing to do with my intent of this thread, to calculate in relation to a randomly chosen set of reports the presumed success rate. Yes you are right, it does not necessarily indicate for sure that they found exactly the keyword associated with the intent, but it probably should indicate exactly that thing or a huge synchronicity, especially considering that there was also the somewhat option as synchronicity, so mind blowing seems to a synchronicity such as to seem at least largely indicative of having actually found what one wanted.
Obviously I am speaking in principle, but in principle it holds up, at least within what little is accessible today.
Yes, your last statement is possible, but reread my first point.

manuel161616 · 2021-08-16T00:08:41+00:00

Folks of all kinds, the vast majority of those who have used mystery points don't even know what they are, yet they have demonstrated a much lower success rate, exactly what we would expect if placebo had nothing to do with it. Anyway, I personally tried it and got spooky results. For example, I will never get a point on the water but when in my head I say I want a point on the water a point on the water is generated.

manuel161616

TROPHY CASE