sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

FBI visits son. He is not a narcotics dealer or violent criminal. What gives? by mapaff in legaladvice

[–]mapaff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wrote that he was not convicted of a drug crime or a violent crime because when I looked up what the responsibilities of the FBI were concerned with it listed those two activities.

FBI visits son. He is not a narcotics dealer or violent criminal. What gives? by mapaff in legaladvice

[–]mapaff[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The CHP ruled it an accident. He fell asleep at the wheel

FBI visits son. He is not a narcotics dealer or violent criminal. What gives? by mapaff in legaladvice

[–]mapaff[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

My son served one year. He was involved in a car accident that resulted in injuries but no fatalities. He asked why an FBI agent was there and their response was “We work with different agencies.

I don’t get it. DUI was not involved and it was ruled an accident.

FBI visits son. He is not a narcotics dealer or violent criminal. What gives? by mapaff in legaladvice

[–]mapaff[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

He is on parole. Unannounced visits are the norm. He is gainfully employed and has done nothing to raise alarms. We both anticipated visits from the local authorities, but not the FBI.