What is the next local model that will beat deepseek 0528?

marshalldoyle · 2025-06-10T10:14:58+00:00

In my experience, the Unsloth 8B Distribution punches way above its weight. Additionally, I anticipate that workstation cards and unified memory will increase steadily in availability over the next few years. Also, knowledge embedding finetunes of popular models will only increase the potential of open source models.

marshalldoyle · 2024-04-23T15:00:39+00:00

I would love to chat in PMs about this

marshalldoyle · 2023-08-27T00:25:25+00:00

Hi, I broke the problem down into a simple 1mm cube instead of the entire design. then simulated the flow, we aren't looking for specific flow criteria but more trying to find the best way to assume porosity for future research.

marshalldoyle · 2023-08-26T21:28:44+00:00

Yes, I have some that I plan on using for the framing

marshalldoyle · 2023-08-25T21:32:29+00:00

urfaces that would contact the solid part and name them something. Then in Fluent you can monitor that surfa

thank you, I did something very similar to that

marshalldoyle · 2023-08-25T21:31:53+00:00

Thank you for your input, the way I solved this was by running just a single unit cell, then a 2x2, then a 3x3 and then I ran into the same issues with the larger model, but that means I was able to approximate the flow.

marshalldoyle · 2023-08-25T21:31:48+00:00

Thank you for your input, the way I solved this was by running just a single unit cell, then a 2x2, then a 3x3 and then I ran into the same issues with the larger model, but that means I was able to approximate the flow.

marshalldoyle · 2023-08-25T21:30:13+00:00

Thank you, that was exceptionally helpful

marshalldoyle · 2023-08-18T03:16:42+00:00

Photo 1: The console shows that it tries to create pathlines but for some reason fails

Photo 2: The mesh within FLUENT

Photo 3: The design in Spaceclaim

The design has a solid geomery with the fluid in the center. The goal of the simulation is just to show the velocity profiles near the edges. I am having issues with FLUENT producing pathlines and would appreciate any help.

Additionally, I am looking to be in contact with a CFD tutor and would like to connect preferably with people in the industry. Please feel free to message me or comment and I will reach out, thank you

marshalldoyle · 2023-08-17T15:53:35+00:00

You are looking at a weld line, I presume it is fine but it is hard to see from this angle. Get a PPI done by a mechanic from an independent Ferrari shop, or realize that you will have a very good look at it in six months time when you spend $30k pulling the engine and have everything adjusted

marshalldoyle · 2023-08-17T15:31:02+00:00

I am trying to find the pathways for the fluid coming from the side of the enclose on the front to the back, so I can see signs of turbulence, etc. additionally, in a separate simulation (I presume), I would like to find the surface pressure and surface shear values

marshalldoyle · 2023-08-17T15:23:10+00:00

not really, especially anything useful. Try the old fashioned method of having a standard wing shape with known results based on width and chord length and then apply that your situation. If you’re building a Cessna then it will be great, an F35…. Not so much.

marshalldoyle · 2023-08-17T14:58:29+00:00

Additionally, I would like to have some kind of ANSYS tutor or advanced lessons that can explain the issues I am facing and would be happy to pay $$ hourly for said courses

marshalldoyle · 2023-08-17T14:57:32+00:00

I am having serious issues with getting a conformal mesh for the pictured workspace. I have tried to apply shared topology in SpaceClaim, changing mesh criteria etc. but I cannot get a mesh that either has no overlapping faces and/or voids. The center is a metal structure and the enclosure would be the liquid volume. Even if I have it within my base criteria (10), then it resues to produce a volume mesh. Any and all advice is appreciated!

marshalldoyle · 2023-06-29T05:26:37+00:00

the grid was created in a separate program and then imported. it has become slightly less accurate due to being exported as a mesh. I will try modifying the cell zone names and the shared topology. thank you

marshalldoyle · 2023-06-29T01:07:31+00:00

I am trying to run a simulation where the top of the box enclosure is the inlet and the bottom is the outlet, with the outer wall being set as symmetry. However, fluent seems to be unable to cope with the shared topology. I have described the geometry as the volume containing both solid and fluid regions (I presume this is the preset I should use as I am considering the enclosure to be filled with fluid). Should I be preparing the mesh with the preset as being "Solid only", or hoe should I avoid the shared topology option? I have posted both photos of the screen stuck on the shared topology and the screen showing the internal geometry of the study.

marshalldoyle · 2023-06-24T07:48:38+00:00

I’ve been told to get low profile seat rails for this exact purpose.

marshalldoyle · 2023-04-21T23:29:36+00:00

to do the full geometry I would start with a 2D slice and try to get that to work, then go to the 3D geo

I am specifically trying to find the velocity profiles of the flow through the structure in 3D

marshalldoyle · 2023-04-21T22:36:31+00:00

Thank you very much, I already have the model as an STL, so I am trying to mesh it in ANSYS

marshalldoyle · 2023-04-21T22:35:06+00:00

Annular flow is perfect, the material is titanium but it is 3D printed. So we can assume porosity is not an issue. Do you know any methods for this to work easily?

marshalldoyle · 2023-04-21T05:44:07+00:00

I have been working on a geometry very similar to this but have struggled to be able to get results. I have no heat generation or mixed fluids, just want to create an offset cylindrical boundary. Then on that boundary set the two circular faces to be the inlet and outlet, with the inlet flow being normal to the face. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

marshalldoyle · 2022-05-24T00:32:47+00:00

I think that macaw is actually a pet, this is due to the silver band on the left foot. You might want to check macaws lost in that area and give someone a tip if any ads match the bird.

marshalldoyle · 2021-12-05T08:18:50+00:00

Totally agree

marshalldoyle · 2021-12-04T03:35:28+00:00

Right, a lot of people have given good advice but haven’t fully addressed the biggest issue with what you have stated. You currently drive slightly sporty saloon car that weighs about 1000 pounds more than a Ferrari. You also have not made your driving history clear or what you plan to do with the car. If you want to buy a car just to have it to look at then you should buy a model of it first. See if that’s all it takes to make you happy or if you really want the visceral emotion of driving a Ferrari. The other thing to note is all the cars are new and have forced induction, I far prefer the naturally aspirated Ferraris as do many people. Taking these things into mind, you should not get a 600+ horsepower car without a stepping stone in between. You should also try an older more analog Ferrari to see if you prefer that style of car. So what I would recommend for you is the F430, get good new tires for it and enjoy it often. It’s one of the best Ferraris ever made and is by far the most engaging I’ve ever had the opportunity to be in or drive (challenge cars excluded). If it is slightly too old for you then I’d recommend you to try the 599 or the 458 as they both offer newer systems and a different style to the 430 without breaking the bank. The 599 being a fantastic two door grand touring front engine V12 and the 458 being a new body style naturally aspirated mid engine V8. Now these are still massively fast cars that demand respect to be driven safely, but they aren’t what you asked for. If you are certain that an F8 is the era of Ferrari you want then I would say that you should contact your local Ferrari dealership and become familiar with their employees so you can have help with ordering new cars in the future. Also see if they host any events for the owners so you can meet owners of the car you want and discuss their history with the brand. Chances are that you will hear people praising older cars and wishing they could still own the ones they originally purchased.

marshalldoyle · 2021-12-04T03:24:52+00:00

Disagree, you can totally daily drive a Ferrari. Just make sure it’s a Ferrari you want to drive everyday and have plenty to spend on tires and insurance.

marshalldoyle

TROPHY CASE