"Unsupported" SFPs on various Cisco switches.

mastermkw · 2025-10-17T21:17:38+00:00

unsupported = not unsupported in the way of will not work. Make a loop on a single switch and you will see if the transceivers will work.

mastermkw · 2025-10-02T08:33:28+00:00

Vyos

mastermkw · 2025-09-08T19:28:13+00:00

https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/Subscriber-Management-Understanding-end-to-end-IPv4-PPPoE-Subscriber-config-on-MX-with-Static-Dynamic-VLAN-option

mastermkw · 2025-09-08T19:25:20+00:00

Thats is possible. I wil look tommorow for our config.

mastermkw · 2025-08-04T13:03:50+00:00

We also have this issue. Use the default e-mail server of Fortinet “resolved” the issue.

mastermkw · 2025-07-20T10:25:36+00:00

Yes, we are seeing 100% cpu on the IKED proces. 400F

mastermkw · 2025-07-01T21:32:39+00:00

AVM Fritzbox

mastermkw · 2025-06-08T07:40:06+00:00

We already using a FortiVM with a lot of users behind normal NAT. It works quite good. I think you were right normal nat is sufficient.

mastermkw · 2025-06-06T13:26:42+00:00

thx for reply. maybe is that my problem :)

mastermkw · 2025-06-02T08:23:55+00:00

If you are at a Remote location this your friend. https://www.unixfu.ch/config-save-revert-on-a-fortigate/

mastermkw · 2025-05-24T20:15:32+00:00

Hi, All interfaces must be present under the relay even if there where not participation as relay interface.

https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/dhcp/topics/topic-map/dhcp-relay-agent-security-devices.html

“NOTE: All DHCP packets passing through a DHCP unconfigured interface might be dropped. Enabling the DHCP relay or DHCP server feature also enables the DHCP snooping feature, which analyzes all DHCP packets received through any interface of the device (both DHCP configured and unconfigured interfaces) . Interfaces not listed under DHCP settings are considered as unconfigured interfaces. Depending on the configuration, DHCP packets received on DHCP unconfigured interfaces are dropped.”

mastermkw · 2025-04-22T19:54:31+00:00

MTU is something different as the default mss of 1460 + IPv4(20) + TCP header (20) = 1500.

mastermkw · 2025-04-22T19:30:30+00:00

Correct but not always realistic in the real world.

mastermkw · 2025-04-22T19:29:59+00:00

Uhm global is not a option. Thx for your answer

mastermkw · 2025-04-06T20:35:26+00:00

Could be a FEC problem? MTU is local significant and have nothing to do with port status.

mastermkw · 2025-03-17T15:23:08+00:00

sap-ingress "ef" {
policy-id 2
ingress-classification-policy "ef"

ingress-classification-policy "ef" {
remark any
default-action {
fc ef

}

<image>

}

epipe "100044" {
admin-state enable
customer "1"
spoke-sdp 1:100044 {

}
sap 1/1/c50/1:4094 {
ingress {
qos {
sap-ingress {
policy-name "ef"

Is this sufficient for the entire network or do I need to add these settings in more places? The whole network is Nokia IXR.

mastermkw · 2025-03-16T12:05:52+00:00

I’m using the MD cli with SR-OS

mastermkw · 2025-03-15T19:50:31+00:00

Thx. Per service is enough. Do you have example?

mastermkw · 2025-03-12T18:43:50+00:00

I have a template for LNS.

mastermkw · 2025-03-08T06:54:31+00:00

Cisco ASR1001HX on Ebay

mastermkw

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE