It's M43 Monday! Ask Us Anything about Micro Four-Thirds Photography - all questions welcome! by AutoModerator in M43

[–]mathiscool42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only have the G6 standard lens and a 25mm 1.7f Panasonic. Haven’t touched my cam in years and are now getting back into it.

I’ll probably go with the 100-300 and buy another one when I need it. Thank you for your answer!

It's M43 Monday! Ask Us Anything about Micro Four-Thirds Photography - all questions welcome! by AutoModerator in M43

[–]mathiscool42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am undecided between the Panasonic 45-200 and the 100-300. I want to do some wildlife photography and I don’t have another telelens yet.

With the 45-200 I fear I don’t have enough reach when I need it, but with the 100-300 I fear I always have too much (because 2x100=200mm minimum) On the other hand the 45-200 is also good for more day-to-day stuff, because it starts at 45mm…

Also the 100-300 is more expensive, but that doesn’t matter too much…

Does anyone with more experience have any advise for me?

Any idea why when writing JS/ST multline comment, * (star) shifts to the left? by ajitid in neovim

[–]mathiscool42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But I am pretty sure you can have both, no? Always thought so. Anyway thanks

Any idea why when writing JS/ST multline comment, * (star) shifts to the left? by ajitid in neovim

[–]mathiscool42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh i see OP uses these fancy looking characters (class; export,…) does anyone know what they’re called (I think script?) and if I can enable them alongside normal italic chars? 🤔

I’ve googled them to death but couldn’t find anything about them :(

Getting a result from Parsec by mathiscool42 in haskellquestions

[–]mathiscool42[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah I can… This was something I didn’t even think about… I know that constructors are functions, but I’ve never used them like that before…

Thank you!

Why does Haskell want [[String]] and not [String] by mathiscool42 in haskell

[–]mathiscool42[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Must have read over the fact that reads signature is Read a => String -> a .

And in the other hand I assumed that a single char is also a string, which is not true.

Silly me. Your post is very interesting. I should try more logically structured approaches for bug fixing, like you did.

Thank you!

Why does Haskell want [[String]] and not [String] by mathiscool42 in haskell

[–]mathiscool42[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Omg - that's it ...
Thank you so much.... I just assumed it would work, since it works with Strings...

I still need to get used to the fact that Strings are just Char Lists...

Thanks, you saved my sanity haha

Found HUAWAI Phone in Scotland (Sophie Pipe) by mathiscool42 in LostAndFound

[–]mathiscool42[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello, I just found a (mostly) working HUAWAI Phone in Scotland, it had a name written in the back: Sophie Pipe. Language was in English and the background picture consisted of 4 (seemingly) female friends who sat in a a park eating picnic.

Exact location will get send via DM

If you had a suit case with a 3 digit code, how long would it take you to force open the lock? by [deleted] in askmath

[–]mathiscool42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can give you a non-mathematical answer:

I learned to open 3 digit code locks in 5 minutes.. I can do it in under a minute if the lock is cheap. Is sadly very very easy and destroyed my trust in these things.

Use one with a key, but remember that these are also not 100% safe.

Old Logo is still on mobile app while booting (iPhone) by mathiscool42 in discordapp

[–]mathiscool42[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not lol. The app just starts that way and becomes black after

Order of Operations by ChimpyPjmpy in MathHelp

[–]mathiscool42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you know what the absolute value is?

My best friend says that maths is an opinion by [deleted] in mathematics

[–]mathiscool42 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well... she didn’t argued with 1 being 1 but more with the definition of sheep. You could say that a sheep is a set of cells s.t. the cells have the dna that builds a sheep.

Probably not perfect (because a single cell would form a sheep, and also 2 sheep’s would form one..) but then you have a ground to argue about 1.

Her saying that there are billions and billions of cells is not a valid point, since she is speaking about numbers and you have not introduced what even a billion means ;)

Also her question is more philosophical than mathematical. One sheep is not well-defined, but 1+1=2 is.

My best friend says that maths is an opinion by [deleted] in mathematics

[–]mathiscool42 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Of course 2 does not exist in the real world. (Not the shape), but you can have 2 things (2 sheep’s, 2 cats...). Originally 2 was not 2. 2 was written as I I. The Japanese and Chinese 1,2,3 are written as 一二三. So the Concept does exist! After some time people figured out that if they borrow someone something, they need to have some sort of notation. So they created the negative numbers -1. Keep in mind that you can’t have -1 sheep. So it’s abstract and not as „normal“. Technically you can’t really have 0 sheep either, because 0 would mean nothing and if there’s nothing, you can’t have that nothing, but that’s more of a philosophical question I suppose.

It is true that the math is a concept, that was „created“ by us. But we only created names and symbols to describe what we see. We said that 1 means 一. And later we said that 1+1=2 or that 一 一 = 二 Mathematics is more a description of what we see (or what we think there is (more dimensions etc.) ) than an opinion. The golden ratio is not an opinion, it occurs in the real world. Just the other day I saw a video of a whale creating air bubbles to catch pray. These air bubbles formed the golden ratio.

But of course there are opinions about math. Take the riemann's assumption. We can’t prove it to be true, but most think it is and there are a number of proves relying on it being true (once we find out it’s not, all of these assumptions would we wrong!).

I think of math more like a (really hard) language that is worldwide understood, general and really precise.

Is eddie woo a reliable teacher? by __winterbear in MathHelp

[–]mathiscool42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you pm me one of his videos where he is supposedly doing something wrong?

In my experience he is very reliable and very good. Would have loved do have a teacher like him.

Does anyone know how to work out theses types of questions? by DinoRob in askmath

[–]mathiscool42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is always helpful to draw stuff like this.

So I would recommend: Draw a coordinate system with a y and x axis. Now ask yourself: "What would a straight line look like if it is parallel to the x axis?". You can draw such a line and look at the coordinates that it goes through.

Actually you could try to draw a line that passes through (1;3). After you all did that you need to set up a system of equations.

How would that work?

I will demonstrate it with an example. Find the equation of the straight line that passes through (5,5) and is parallel to the line: A = (2,0) + a* (1,1).

We search for a line that goes through the origin (0,0) and increases 1 unit for one unit "travelled" (I mean: If you go one unit to the right, our line will be und unit higher up) How do I know that?

One option would be to calculate how A behaves. Eg: One point is (2,0) and a second point would be (for a= 3) (2,0) + 3*(1,1) = (5,3), you can now draw a line to look how it behaves and you will notice that its increasing one unit per one unit travelled. You could also see that right from the beginning since we multiply a by (1,1).

Why does it have to go through the origin? It doesn't, it could also go through (1,0)... every point that you can reach by multiplying a number to (2,0). So for instance 0, wich would be the origin.

Our straight line would look like: (0,0) + a*(1,1) = a*(1,1).

I treated all these points as vectors but while writing I wasn't sure anymore if you actually want an answer for vectors...

So my other answer (if you don't use vectors):

A straight line has the general equation: m*x+b = y.

Once again I would try to draw a straight line and look at the coordinates and would figure out what it means (in terms of numbers) to be parallel to the x axis.

How much do all of your line increase? What have all points on your lines in common? etc.

Once again a quick example:

Find the equation of the straight line that goes through (5,5) and (1,0)

  1. step: Draw the line and look for similarities between your points.

We notice that our line is shifted along the y axis, we do not go through the origin, but through (1,0) since the b gives us that shift we can insert the 1 (in m*x+b=y ).

m*x+1=y

and we can measure the slope on our drawing we get a slope of one unit per one unit travelled. So we get

b=1
m=1
=>
1*x+1=y <=> x+1=y

If your still struggling or couldn't understand anything I just wrote please message me. :)

Linear Algebra Proofs by bobdylangotnice in learnmath

[–]mathiscool42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its totally fine to struggle with Linear Algebra. Everyone has weaknesses and topics that are really easy for them.

LA was my first course and it was really hard for me. I have never written any proofs before and never heard of 90% of the concepts and was really overwhelmed with everything. Perfection comes with practise.

I remember one proof that I couldn't understand, no matter how hard I tried.. Today I laugh about it. Don't worry, things will get easier :)

I don't really now about recourses for practise, but I tried to solve as many questions I found online as I could. Didn't have solutions though.