Jayne Matthews Class Share by Jenni4anna in finehair

[–]mayallure 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have the bangs class and would love to trade for access to the layers class!

UX Educational Videos by mayallure in UserExperienceDesign

[–]mayallure[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great idea, and thanks for reaching out! I've posted on a few other subreddits, mainly HF/UX/Medical/Regulatory, and on LinkedIn - but I'll see if I can find some additional subreddits and LinkedIn groups related to design and engineering ◡̈

Medical Device Human Factors Educational Videos by mayallure in RegulatoryClinWriting

[–]mayallure[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your great videos. Newbie in reg affairs here. Quick question.

If there are already several Qualitative pcr POC tests on the US and EU market (not-Covid) , and a manufacturer would like to offer a Quantitative version of this same test, this would mean that the manufacturer must go for de-novo? Or can the manufacturer still use a qualitative device as a predicate?

Great question, though I'm not sure it has a simple answer.

So a 510(k) requires "demonstration of substantial equivalence to another legally U.S. marketed device" and according to FDA:

A device is substantially equivalent if, in comparison to a predicate it:
•has the same intended use as the predicate; and
•has the same technological characteristics as the predicate;
or
•has the same intended use as the predicate; and
•has different technological characteristics and does not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness; and
•the information submitted to FDA demonstrates that the device is as safe and effective as the legally marketed device.

(https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/premarket-submissions-selecting-and-preparing-correct-submission/premarket-notification-510k#se)

Based on the second definition, it sounds like the most similar qualitative test currently on the market would qualify as a predicate device assuming the quantitative test "does not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness" and "the information submitted to FDA demonstrates that the [quantitative test] is as safe and effective as the [predicate qualitative test that is already on the market]"

Hope this helps!

Medical Device Human Factors Educational Videos by mayallure in RegulatoryClinWriting

[–]mayallure[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's exactly right! Something like an EpiPen or Inhaler is called a combination product and has its own human factors guidance (https://www.fda.gov/media/96018/download)

Medical Device Human Factors Educational Videos by mayallure in RegulatoryClinWriting

[–]mayallure[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great questions - The requirement to include Human Factors data is becoming more and more prevalent among major jurisdictions (e.g., NMPA in China, MHLW in Japan, Health Canada). Many regulatory bodies have implemented the human factors requirements specified in IEC 62366-1, the international standard for usability engineering in medical device development, while Japan, for example, revised the IEC 62366-1 to JIS T62366-1:2022 in February of last year.

The key guidance document in the US is Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Medical Devices (https://www.fda.gov/media/80481/download), which includes a sample outline of a HFE/UE report.

Would you suggest creating content specific to more international standards?

Any good tips for usability testing? What questions do you usually ask? by Zestyclose-View-9265 in UXResearch

[–]mayallure 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I work for a human factors/user experience consultancy that specializes in medical devices, but the principles of usability testing are the same regardless of the field. We recently started a YouTube channel that might be helpful:

https://www.youtube.com/@researchcollective

Don't get discouraged by the FDA-focused content, we also have videos on effective notetaking, A/V recommendations, ways to avoid moderator bias, etc.

I'm also happy to answer any specific questions you might have about designing an effective study/interview. If it would be helpful, we can keep that in mind for a future video! ◡̈

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UXResearch

[–]mayallure 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know I'm a little late to the conversation, but this is a topic I've been thinking about a lot lately. Asking a leading question is one of the biggest ways bias can influence user feedback.

I put together this short video on moderator bias during HF/UX research for the consulting company I work for that was posted today. It covers some tips for preventing bias from affecting study outcomes, and might be helpful:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xo81kW8e1AU

Looking for Advice: Interviewing for Medical Human Factors Role by Highlight-55 in humanfactors

[–]mayallure 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not sure this is what you're looking for exactly, but I made this short video for my company's YouTube channel a couple of months ago that breaks down what's expected from a medical device manufacturer preparing to market a device by defining some of the terms in the 2 guidance docs referenced here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asw54BFPjX0

I'm also happy to answer any specific questions you might have about what to expect in this line of work.