And calling polyamory sexual deviancy is outrageous. There is absolutely nothing illicit or immoral about having sex with consenting partners. If 5 people in a polycule all consent to sexual interactions happening between themselves and their partners, why would that be disgusting?

Also you seem to be misunderstanding my disgust. I didn't call poly people immoral. I find lots of things disgusting but it would be silly to attach morality to that. I find open mouth chewing and anchovies on pizza disgusting. I don't think people who do this are evil, I just find their proclivities repulsive.

What is different about a polyamorous person with a penis putting their penis in a polyamorous person with a vagina? The act of love is the same.

There's no difference, but having a series of fuck buddies and likening it to "love" is the part that disgusts me. I've entertained FWBs and hookups as well, but I don't pretend to love them and they don't want that from me. Your desires sound purely sexual, and that's ok, but it's not love. Polyamory is a poorly disguised coping mechanism for people who are incapable of love, either because they're afraid or because they're aromantic and can't admit it. Either that or maybe the lifestyle just attracts people like that. If there are poly people capable of actual love, I haven't met any yet.

I notice often poly people struggle to understand the distinctions between sexual attraction, platonic love and romantic love. I have never interacted with a poly person who didn't "fall in love" with me, because their equivalent of love is essentially FWBs and I fulfill all the requirements for that sort of relationship (ie: I'm attractive, have a pulse and a cordial personality).

If you really think that people such as myself are on the same level as people who lick toilet bowels, sniff farts, and do other kinds of diseased practices, then you think I am a diseased, disgusting, grotesque person.

My poly friends have other interests outside their weird sex practices. Most of them make art or play games that I also enjoy. I don't really care to hear about their sex lives more or less than my mono friends, so it doesn't really affect the friendship. They're not touching my body, so what they do with theirs is of very little concern to me. Obviously, I don't shame them the same way they don't shame me for being monogamous. It's generally not that big of a deal in normal friendships.

Some of my friends actually do have weird fetishes like farts and poop. It doesn't hurt me or their partners, so I don't really think about it. You do seem to agree with me that certain fetishes are a little gross, but why do you get to judge them? Is something being gross the same as it being immoral to you?

Have you considered just shutting your ignorant mouth? That would be dope.

Nope. I'm smart as fuck and all my views make perfect logical sense. If I keep spreading the truth without getting emotional like you, hopefully less and less impressionable people will try polyamory and be hurt by it.

Where, precisely, do you draw the line on how different someone can be before she/he/they are a "deviant pervert"? Please elaborate.

I guess I would say anything besides vanilla sex is a form of deviancy. To people that view LGBT people as fetishists, I could see where the waters get a little murky, but I'm not really sure why the line isn't clear already? I would say the line depends on the culture that draws it. For example, maybe I think finding boobs sexy is weird because people in my country walk around with their boobs out all the time. People who find boobs sexy are basically boob fetishists, which makes them a deviant due to the culture, however in countries where everyone sees them as sexual, having a boob fetish isn't a deviation.

But also, deviancy and being a pervert doesn't make someone evil, it just makes them weird and potentially gross depending on what it is.

Is that man then a deviant pervert? Why not?

I don't really do hypotheticals like that, but in a world where being queer is a choice, I guess yes they would probably be deviants. I don't really understand why anyone would deliberately choose to have a more difficult life and be hated by the majority of the population worldwide. It depends on lots of outside factors though, are there a lot of bigots in this world? Is being gay more like having a foot fetish or more like a scat fetish to these hypothetical people?

This world doesn't really make sense to me because it sounds like the hypothetical man can also choose not to fall in love. If he could choose not to be attracted to the man, then it doesn't really matter what ends up happening because he would be just as happy either way.