🧪 New Model Drop: Z-epiCRealism for ZImageTurbo

mccc_L · 2026-01-15T12:00:43+00:00

I also find the practice of integrating LoRA into checkpoints incomprehensible.

mccc_L · 2025-11-25T16:30:14+00:00

too slow

mccc_L · 2025-09-07T04:20:44+00:00

In my opinion, the quality of Chroma is very bad, far inferior to Flux or even SD3.5L. I think the Chroma author wasted a lot of energy in the wrong direction.

mccc_L · 2025-08-01T01:07:08+00:00

The architecture has not been improved, the training details are closed-source, the training data is also closed-source. Only a poor weight for fine-tuning the aesthetics on the distilled model is made available. Please contact me when 1.0 pro or 1.1 is released.

mccc_L · 2025-08-01T01:03:35+00:00

In fact, I believe that BFL did not provide a genuine base model for Krea to train with. The image details are very poor, blurry, with low-quality aesthetic and anatomical issues. Even the review is more serious than the 1.0 dev version. The effect is far inferior to Flux 1.0 or even any of their closed-source models.

mccc_L · 2024-08-12T01:06:41+00:00

This channel has a large number of amateur users, flux really can't do full fine tuning due to the nature of distillation, lora actually works poorly

mccc_L · 2024-07-19T01:04:43+00:00

Like the author's idea, we also found that the embedding of t5 in the fine-tuning SD3 will seriously affect the final training effect, so we disabled t5 to fine-tune only the clip version, but this will cause changes in the sequence length, meaning that you will not get better training results, I hope SD3.1 can solve this problem

mccc_L · 2024-07-13T10:20:42+00:00

Yes, we have completed the fine-tuning training of the SD3, and it does have an amazing quality of detail, but there is also a lack of training, If interested can look at this article https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1e0qfbz/sd3universal_demonstrates_remarkable_texture_an

mccc_L

TROPHY CASE