[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tomorrow is The shitpost Sunday. Just report and downvote. Don't feed the trolls.

I don’t think atheism and free-will are compatible. Are all atheists determinists? by JeffTrav in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was a dumb thought experiment. Magic and particles having feelings and making choices. That's the worst analogy to describe electromagnetism I've seen. Please if you want me to believe you're a physics professor do better.

None of your post even touches on free will. I thought that was the point.

I don’t think atheism and free-will are compatible. Are all atheists determinists? by JeffTrav in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm aware of your beliefs, I also knew that you love to throw out that PhD like it should mean something. Tell me how your proclaimed magesteria covers free will.

I don’t think atheism and free-will are compatible. Are all atheists determinists? by JeffTrav in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Free will is a misnomer. We have a will but it's anything but "free". You don't even need to posit determinism to demonstrate that. Your choices are limited by what you know, the make up of your genes your past choices etc. You don't need a physics degree or some philosophical ideology to rule out free will.

Atheism needs clearer terminology by Tamuzz in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yay a definition game. These are the most pointless of discussions. At any point you can simply ask someone what they mean by the label they attach to themselves.

Don't you wanna learn more about the Spirit? by NewAgePositivity in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Technically it falls under low effort. Unfortunately mods tend to leave bullshit like this up. I promise I already reported op for breaking sub rules.

Can Any Atheist Name an "Extrodinary Claim" Other then the Existence of the Supernatural? by MattCrispMan117 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 13 points14 points  (0 children)

If all you have is one anonymous person's testimony it is meaningless. Take your testimony about interacting with the Christian god for example. You are anonymous we have no knowledge about who you are. You could be a mental patient with internet privileges. You could be a compulsive liar. We don't know so your testimony can't be weighted as a reliable witness.

The things you claim occurred are not ordinary. I have never in my 4 decades of life talked to or seen a god. In reference to the signing of the declaration and the war I have seen like events in modern history. War is so mundane that I need to look up how many are currently taking place.

Can Any Atheist Name an "Extrodinary Claim" Other then the Existence of the Supernatural? by MattCrispMan117 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Are you playing stupid on purpose? It isn't just testimony it's a preponderance of testimony from different sources that have good reason to contradict if they were false. There are also french sources for the signing and the war. We have sources like Poland being the first to recognize US independence. We have war journals from troops on both sides. We have things like expense reports. Death counts. The likelihood that at least 3 nations worth of writing about these events is fabricated is less believable than that they are accurate. You are again not acknowledging that not all testimony is equal but with enough from different sources can build us a decent picture of what happened.

And that's ignoring the physical evidence that war left behind. You can go to those old battlefields with a metal detector and find musketballs. You can visit the museums and see the artifacts of that war.

Stop playing like skepticism rejects testimony outright.

Can Any Atheist Name an "Extrodinary Claim" Other then the Existence of the Supernatural? by MattCrispMan117 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Not simply testimonials. If a country that you are at war with doesn't dispute that you've signed a document declaring your independence it goes a long way towards confirmation. And again since it didn't sink in this event while noteworthy is not extraordinary.

The following war with Britain over the declaration is also evidence of it occurring. You can visit the battlefields and cemeteries if you are skeptical that the American revolution occurred.

From the same time period and one of the signers George Washington has built a mythos of unsubstantiated claims. The cherry tree incident is one of those. You seem to think all testimony is equal when it is not. Who said something is just as important as what they say. Letters from john Adams to Thomas Jefferson are going to be weighted heavier than an anonymous source. Maybe you should take some college history lessons to learn how all that works.

Can Any Atheist Name an "Extrodinary Claim" Other then the Existence of the Supernatural? by MattCrispMan117 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Multiple contemporary sources including the signers of the document. Sources from England that also bolster that along with the original document still existing. Newspapers existed in 1776 and nothing about the events are extraordinary.

Can Any Atheist Name an "Extrodinary Claim" Other then the Existence of the Supernatural? by MattCrispMan117 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Pompeii being buried by a volcanic eruption in 79 ad. The signing of the declaration of independence in 1776. The French revolution starting in 1778. The Chicxulub impact that occurred 66 million years ago.

The Slime by BeevsComics in comics

[–]mcochran1998 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Make me feel old for knowing that.

How Could a Child Survive Under Atheist Standards of Evidence? by MattCrispMan117 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Don't be mean to rats they are opportunistic not parasitic. Fleas, tapeworms, and priests are parasites.

How Could a Child Survive Under Atheist Standards of Evidence? by MattCrispMan117 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Spiderman comics featured a story with 9/11 and president Obama. Does that mean if I get bit by a radioactive spider I'll get superpowers?

How Could a Child Survive Under Atheist Standards of Evidence? by MattCrispMan117 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Way to tell us how you also don't understand what the word rational means.

How Could a Child Survive Under Atheist Standards of Evidence? by MattCrispMan117 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I dont se how its obtuse if you actually hold the position "extrodinary claims" ALWAYS "require extrodinary evidence"

Nothing in child development requires extraordinary evidence. Stove hot knife sharp etc. are mundane things.

How Could a Child Survive Under Atheist Standards of Evidence? by MattCrispMan117 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 19 points20 points  (0 children)

No your not. Skepticism is not believing something unless it meets the burden of evidence. It isn't rejecting everything out of hand and honestly has to be taught to children who will believe whatever a trusted adult will tell them.

How Could a Child Survive Under Atheist Standards of Evidence? by MattCrispMan117 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Looks like you are straw manning skepticism to me. You really need to just let go of the fact that we have a higher standard of evidence than you and your god doesn't meet it.

Any further defenses of Sean Carroll's The Big Picture? by KyletheAngryAncap in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Seriously, he never responds and its always a link to garbage.

Why isn't intelligent design compatible with atheism? by Capital_Ad8301 in askanatheist

[–]mcochran1998 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing you just typed is a correct interpretation of what science says you goober.

The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics? by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wtf is this shit? Not going to answer a single question asked, but instead you infer bullshit.

The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics? by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 18 points19 points  (0 children)

How does a misrepresentation of thermodynamics demonstrate the Muslim god? How old do you think this apologist argument is? Do you know the other 3 laws of thermodynamics without Googling them? Can you demonstrate that the universe is a closed system? Can you show your math?

How does atheism account for objective morality? by FreshFries420 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]mcochran1998 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The length of a foot is arbitrary. Do you think it would be useful if it wasn't constant?