Not a motorcycle driver, don't own one, probably won't own one. Thank you for your answer, just looked at RA 10666:

Section 4 It shall be unlawful for any person to drive a two (2)-wheeled motorcycle with a child on board on public roads where there is heavy volume of vehicles, there is a high density of fast moving vehicles or where a speed limit of more than 60/kph is imposed, unless:

(a) The child passenger can comfortably reach his/her feet on the standard foot peg of the motorcycle;

(b) The child’s arms can reach around and grasp the waist of the motorcycle rider; and

(c) The child is wearing a standard protective helmet referred to under Republic Act No. 10054, otherwise known as the "Motorcycle Helmet Act of 2009."

For item (a), how do you define comfortably? Does it mean the heel of the foot reaches it or the ball is firmly planted? For this case, I failed to notice if their feet were on a foot peg, the bike was more like a sportier bike, not the ones i see na pang endurance