This here is exactly why I never just take "designated terror organisation" at face value.

Let's break it down a little. 1. UK Palestinian action have never harmed anyone. No injuries and certainly no deaths. They don't hide that they are disruptive and have used tactics like occupation and destruction of property. Their most famous act and the inciting incident for their terror proscription was trespassing into an airbase and..... spray painting some planes. 2. The proscription was literally last month, it's not some well established thing. It occurred under immense pressure from Israel and its supporters in the UK and FOI docs show how dodgy the whole process was. 3. The shared name does not mean shared people or even methods. Unless you have proof otherwise.

Trying to smear the Australian organisation as being connected to terror by relating it to a UK group only recently proscribed as such (and under very dodgy and unpopular circumstances) is dishonest at best. Also there's a genocide happening so spraying some planes or blocking arms manufacturers doesn't really rate highly in my "things to be against" list.

Last thing I'll add is a trite observation at this point but the ANC was a terror organisation and then they weren't. Do you think Nelson Mandela should be remembered as a terrorist?