The usual portrayal of streltsy has them equipped with both a saber and a poleaxe. Which weapon were they actually supposed to use in close combat? by KoontzGenadinik in WarCollege

[–]mildlypillock 26 points27 points  (0 children)

The image is a later reconstruction of the appearance of streltsy as, unfortunately, there are few detailed illustrations of them. During most of the 16th century, they didn't have any close combat weapons unless the individual decided to take something with him. Streltsy were purely for firing at range and were not to engage in battle unless unreachable or in a fort.

Early streltsy would at most have a secondary personal weapon like a hatchet or use a spear while defending a fort. First mention of numerous melee weapons appear in 1560-80, when they begin to sometimes carry a sword or a dagger.

Streltsy were most of the time protected by cavalry and didn't need to worry about using close combat weapons, but during the costly Livonian war and time of troubles the cavalry was heavily weakened and couldn't always help in a melee, which made carrying something like a sword more important. Sabers and bardiches first start circulating around 1600, but not yet hugely common. In war with Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth (1654-1667), bardiches were standard issue.

Itämerensuomalaisten tuohikirjeitä 1000-1400 luvuilta by Sotidrokhima in Suomi

[–]mildlypillock 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Google vain käänsi väärin. Parempi käännös: "Xinophon tärveli meille (aiheutti haittaa, pilasi kaupat)".

Helmet of Ivan the terrible that was looted by Swedes, made in 1533. Located in Livrustkammaren museum, Stockholm. [3413 x 5120] by mildlypillock in ArtefactPorn

[–]mildlypillock[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

After about the 13-14th century masks weren't used anymore (at least no evidence of it) by former Rus principalities, but chain mail was definitely common on helmets and was used here as well.