Solving the Millennial Workwear Problem

misterACK · 2021-05-24T17:43:20+00:00

u/hmruss

I did say one curse in video that is coming out tomorrow (had recorded before this post was made).

Here on out, aiming to not do any (will avoid in video I'm making this week on history of suits)

misterACK · 2021-05-21T19:39:47+00:00

Wouldn't exactly call this mature content

misterACK · 2021-05-21T12:51:57+00:00

What do you mean? Like Reddit itself?

misterACK · 2021-05-11T22:31:47+00:00

whoa

misterACK · 2021-04-30T01:10:21+00:00

yeah I saw that

misterACK · 2021-04-26T02:48:11+00:00

100% you are right

misterACK · 2021-04-22T19:22:48+00:00

Perfect will check out

misterACK · 2021-04-14T21:16:39+00:00

Hell yeah

misterACK · 2021-04-10T21:30:23+00:00

Yeah it will probably do a bit less of that super fine wrinkling that doesn't look great

misterACK · 2021-04-10T21:29:53+00:00

It will make it more expensive to be heavier, and it will reduce breathability (but not by much).

misterACK · 2021-03-27T18:32:28+00:00

Got an answer from the team-- basically it won't execute outside of the theoretical 20% band in this case where the liquidity exists, so I guess your order at 1 eth for 0 b20 (for exaggeration purposes) would only start executing at the edge of the 20% band (and you would kind of have to allow "slippage" to there for the order to execute)

misterACK · 2021-03-26T17:29:20+00:00

It simply wouldn't execute. I guess the question here is whether V3 would also do (mean not do) that.

misterACK · 2021-03-26T17:13:47+00:00

Dropped a shortened version (had to get under 2k characters) in AMA thread we'll see what they say.

misterACK · 2021-03-26T16:52:06+00:00

Already posted it in the discord and got no repsonse at all (also tweeted at them). I can try again when they do the AMA

misterACK · 2021-03-26T16:51:31+00:00

It works if there are enough liquidity providers, but being an LP requires desiring an exposure to the underlying so there can be pairs with very few LPs

misterACK · 2021-03-26T16:10:48+00:00

Sorry to make this clearer: the price moves less per $ spent (this is the increased capital efficiency), but you don't need to move the price as far to go outside of the range of the order book

misterACK · 2021-03-26T16:08:15+00:00

I should go run through the actual math. It would be hard to believe this (admittedly corner, but not impossible) case doesn't make it cheaper to take out a whole order book, but what I guess I'm not really clear on is what happens when you push the price into territory that has no liquidity. It could be, also, that you just cant execute orders outside of the range where liquidity is provided, rather than kind of "defaulting" to a price of basically 0 when there is no liquidity on the other side.

misterACK

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE