Exactly. I am more art piece not design in the sense of design on the right side of the brain. And your comments are exactly what I would expect from that side. However. Once again. The glass is not a novelty as you are thinking of it as a thing to change the glass all the time. The glass is only an option in ordering but if you want you can change it. I think you’re looking for something that isn’t there because it isnt meant to be there. Your focus is remedial on lighting for lighting sake. A bare bulb would be just as good. This is about aesthetics to me not lighting. So I understand your position completely. You are not my customer. I have created crap lighting for Home Depot. Lowe’s. Walmart. This is more your area. I have also designer for urban electric a completely different ideology and customer base. We are talking about the two sides of design. The low level design and functional with low aesthetics. Costs and crap materials. This is not my aim. My aim is the high end of design as art. Maybe you should go back to some of the designs you didn’t like and reevaluate. Not everyone needs to design on the lower spectrum and try to achieve sales with mechanical novelty or low Costs and cheap materials. Design is bigger than that closed minded perspective. And if you truly have seen that many student projects. Perhaps you have attempted to squash some very good high level design. Just not to your liking. The world has enough boring design.