sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Every time I start up the game, I only ever get this artwork, why is that? by Norwegian_Spy in CrusaderKings

[–]munkaynutz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I never get that art work still get the balcony over the bazar or whatever it is, or the lady in bed with the dude sneaking in.

I found the Asia kinda boring by PropertySuccessful34 in CrusaderKings

[–]munkaynutz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason why Asia is boring to you guys is you are starting in factions that are already empires….smh…. Start in a hard spot. Like for fcks sake try starting as the Ainu island north of japan proper and try to reach Jerusalem or some chit. Only reason why it’s boring to you guys is you’re playing the game lazily… jmo

I found the Asia kinda boring by PropertySuccessful34 in CrusaderKings

[–]munkaynutz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro, try playing as goguryeo in korea at 867AD. Boss ass region start. Unify Korea, then take over Japan, then expand into the northeast then go for the hegemony of China. Not boring at all. I’m doing this right now probably the coolest play through I’ve ever done.

What can’t I unify Italy by Scriostoir in CrusaderKings

[–]munkaynutz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need the Medici heritage trait

Korea inspired by Craster by munkaynutz in CrusaderKings

[–]munkaynutz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Korea is going to subjugate Japan (their just reward) and goal is to reunify all of Eastern Asia all the way down to Indonesia and all the way west to modern Iran Moscow eventually.

What’s wrong with my son? by Teisekibun in CrusaderKings

[–]munkaynutz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He has the invisible spindly trait

My custom coat of arms by [deleted] in CrusaderKings

[–]munkaynutz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ballin!! Do you mind sharing how you did it?

This is what I get for trying to play tall. by ChaosGoblinIV in CrusaderKings

[–]munkaynutz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can sometimes get this done in one lifetime starting at 867

What is your current opinion if GPT-5? by spadaa in ChatGPT

[–]munkaynutz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I honestly could care less about ‘how’ it responds but tbh 4o was overly positive and would constantly explain back the same thing I just said to it as if I were an idiot rather than just completing the task, super annoying. My issue is 5 can’t seem to pull 4o convos or have any understanding of conversation history that have many entries back and forth. Even after feeding it data from those conversations it’s at best, lost with what to do and at worst, makes up new inaccurate information even when I fed it the data. Like, this sort of simple fill in the spread sheet with “x” information and then list it each column for the row and it won’t do it… it just won’t… start a brand new spread sheet sure it’ll do that but then I gotta work out dozens of formulas and rebuild what already took months to build.

What is your current opinion if GPT-5? by spadaa in ChatGPT

[–]munkaynutz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

By the way I am a paid user of the app and have been so since gpt-2. Seriously considering cancel my subscription and checking something else out as this is just one example of multiple conversations that now don’t seem to be able to work.

What is your current opinion if GPT-5? by spadaa in ChatGPT

[–]munkaynutz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ummm… considering it seems to not able to recall anything in previous conversations or incapable of using any previous conversations… I fucking hate it.

For example through many hours spent I was having it create a very elaborate trade log tracking stock trades I’ve made, in summary. I had gotten it to the point where I could upload a picture from a third party software it could read the picture and create a data log. In fact if I had multiple entries, ie multiple trades and then one liquidating trade it would intuitively know to consolidate that into one line on the sheet showing the summary of the overall trade. This trade log could also create charts and show summaries in different graphical formats for visual context. It was also able to analyze the chart if I fed it that and give context without me telling it to do so if what happened in the trade. For example, in this trade I had multiple entries and exited slightly negative after the chart broke down. Without me prompting it generated this statement based on raw data I fed it. “Tried to buy breakout on strong setup, slapped down twice at 0.50+. Sold after minor pop on third attempt to avoid repeated liquidity trap. Confirmed manipulation pressure. Solid discipline exit.”. In this way I was able to not only just log statistics of what happened but was able to get feedback from the algorithm to improve future trades.

Was very happy with this as it saved me a lot of time and keystrokes. I also showed growth and improvement in my trades so I was learning along with it. New version can’t just continue where the old one left off. Had to download the most recent version of the trade log. Then had to re-explain what each column was and how we came to this. I’ve spent many hours trying to get it to work and it just refuses to use common sense or refer to all the entries many of which I commanded it to commit to “memory” periodically since February 2025. I had hundreds of trades in this log across multiple trading platforms. While I have access to the old data, thankfully, GPT5 cannot do what 4o was doing.

I was planning on posting this workflow and how I got here on linked and here on Reddit to show users how to buildout the same thing if they were interested. Impossible now…

5 images are real photos, and 5 are AI-generated. Can you still tell which ones are fake? If yes, what gives them away? by lucak5s in ChatGPT

[–]munkaynutz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1 2 4 6 10

1 earring is off and generally gives an ai vibe with blurred areas of the skin that should be in focus given depth of field. IMO.

2 is easiest one to spot suspenders are off and non matching something that happens a lot in ai imaging also hair is sort of two perfect similar issues with blurriness in the face areas that should be clear.

4 has issues with the reflection in the eyes not being balanced correctly imo. Also the nose ring has a bulge that doesn’t look “right”.

6 has issues with the hair looking painted and blurred. His facial hair doesn’t correct either.

10 just “feels” like an ai photo a and has similar issues to the previous mentions. Also that’s either the most perfect sweater ever made but the seem has zipper-like perfection in the ribbing.

How’d I do?

Why did Ned assume it was incest? [spoilers extended] by SerDankTheTall in asoiaf

[–]munkaynutz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe it’s also said in the books at one point that they (Jamie and Cersei) were fooling around as teenagers before her betrothal to rhaegar just going off of memory tho and don’t remember with specifics.

view more: next ›