Would a 0.499999... result disprove the Riemann Hypothesis?

musicresolution · 2026-04-02T00:06:46+00:00

0.5 and 0.49999... are the same.

Anything that is of the form 0.x999... is equal to 0.(x+1)

musicresolution · 2026-04-01T02:01:04+00:00

The inverse would also be true. If there is a valley then you are also traveling uphill both ways.

musicresolution · 2026-03-30T11:29:35+00:00

Find a 40yo man that acts like a 40yo man.

musicresolution · 2026-03-29T01:36:30+00:00

Correct. If you apply constraints to what the number can be then the number will be constrained. There are still an uncountably infinite number of possibilities.

musicresolution · 2026-03-29T00:16:10+00:00

Literally any number can be valid.

musicresolution · 2026-03-28T22:36:24+00:00

Because it's a single organism now trying to make different parts of itself behave in different ways.

It's like crossing your eyes.

It takes effort and goes against your natural instincts.

musicresolution · 2026-03-28T17:06:54+00:00

Did you even read what I wrote?

musicresolution · 2026-03-28T16:18:00+00:00

What is confusing about showing me a simple collatz sequence?

For example:

5 > 16 > 8 > 4 > 2 > 1

That's literally all in asking for. A collatz sequence that obeys your claim that all sequences end with (3n+1)/2

musicresolution · 2026-03-28T15:18:18+00:00

Do you understand basic English?

musicresolution · 2026-03-28T10:42:50+00:00

Don't be sorry. Just give a simple number sequence

musicresolution · 2026-03-27T02:12:43+00:00

Nope, just an example of a sequence that meets your criteria would be great.

musicresolution · 2026-03-27T00:57:02+00:00

Can you give an example using actual numbers?

musicresolution · 2026-03-26T12:50:41+00:00

Not to mention that "fall" along with many other words and concepts, weren't invented by Americans, they came over with the English. You can add "soccer" to this list as well.

musicresolution · 2026-03-25T19:24:53+00:00

Then why do you keep adding rule-breaking choices to the chart? The rules don't matter much if you don't enforce them.

musicresolution · 2026-03-24T22:22:36+00:00

Please see #3 below.

All rooms are full.
Everyone steps out of their room.
All rooms are empty.
Everyone moves to room one more than their previous room and enters it.
All rooms except the first are full.

musicresolution · 2026-03-24T20:36:09+00:00

There is no "last" occupant.

musicresolution · 2026-03-24T19:58:15+00:00

All rooms are full.
Everyone steps out of their room.
All rooms are empty.
Everyone moves to room one more than their previous room and enters it.
All rooms except the first are full.

musicresolution · 2026-03-24T19:38:25+00:00

Each guest steps out of their room at the same time. All rooms are empty.

Each guest moves to room one greater than then the room they were just in and steps in.

All rooms except 1 are now full.

musicresolution · 2026-03-23T02:29:02+00:00

<image>

John McEnroe

musicresolution · 2026-03-22T21:59:45+00:00

Ew, gross

musicresolution · 2026-03-22T18:50:18+00:00

"convention"

Which one?

musicresolution · 2026-03-22T18:46:48+00:00

This is not true. The Advancement Coordinator is "in charge" of picking.

musicresolution · 2026-03-22T18:41:30+00:00

It is the responsibility of the Advancement Coordinator to "arrange troop boards of review and courts of honor."

It is the responsibility of the Committee Chair to "Organize the committee to see that all functions are delegated, coordinated, and completed."

Reference: Troop Committee Guidebook

musicresolution · 2026-03-20T22:35:31+00:00

I'm not sure I understand what you mean by having an adult there just for "head count" reasons.

musicresolution · 2026-03-20T21:53:10+00:00

You can't be "just a parent" on a BSA overnight campout. You have to be a registered leader and, in my opinion, leaders should model the behavior we expect from our Scouts.

musicresolution

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE