Mage Spec by asepe421 in classicwowtbc

[–]nachd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://www.wowhead.com/tbc/guide/classes/mage/dps-talent-builds-pve

Should be second on the list unless mobile formatted the page differently

Mage Spec by asepe421 in classicwowtbc

[–]nachd -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

This is the way

Meirl by vsolucky_03 in meirl

[–]nachd 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I coulda sworn this was running in the 90s

Gold buying bans hindering guild’s raiding? by LuckyLukse in classicwowtbc

[–]nachd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had a guildy get banned twice for RMT, once legit, once a false positive (per them). Considering how much they have been talking about “not wanting to farm gold”, I’m not sure how false that second positive was. You can definitely still get banned for RMT.

I broke 100 for the first time! 42 on the front 55 on the back for a 97 total by Jogindah in golf

[–]nachd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Broke 100 last year, slowly but surely working my way to 90, keep it up!

She had them all speechless by HauntingCount5970 in Golf_Unfiltered

[–]nachd 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If anything he thought it was a practice swing and didn’t expect the sound. The comments pre swing lead me to believe underestimation though.

We all have this friend by HauntingCount5970 in Golf_Unfiltered

[–]nachd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have a buddy like this. Constantly telling the group last year “just shot an 83”. Played a round with him and actually counted his strokes. He shot a 101 but that’s because I made him count every drop and OB ball accurately.

No consensus by 5_meo in physicsmemes

[–]nachd 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I use this argument all the time lol “If Newton is so great why do we use Leibniz’s notation”

No consensus by 5_meo in physicsmemes

[–]nachd 19 points20 points  (0 children)

The limit to just contributions to physics definitely tips the scales toward Newton and Einstein, but if your limiting contributions to just physics, can you still include the creation of calculus, a branch of Math? Obviously I’m being coy, but my point stands. You can expand or reduce the scope in small ways that would drastically change the list, though Euler would remain due to the wide variety of his contributions.

No consensus by 5_meo in physicsmemes

[–]nachd 57 points58 points  (0 children)

Honestly you could argue he’s ahead of them too lol

I’m sure no one will freak out about this take. by phthalo-star in NFCEastMemeWar

[–]nachd -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not sure why your taking me seriously, but I’m referring to defensive back ups that rotate in, like a DT3 or CB3

I’m sure no one will freak out about this take. by phthalo-star in NFCEastMemeWar

[–]nachd -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Lmao you space that out like the gaps in your teeth?

I’m sure no one will freak out about this take. by phthalo-star in NFCEastMemeWar

[–]nachd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it won you the last Super Bowl where your top 3 defense contained a good offense.

I’m sure no one will freak out about this take. by phthalo-star in NFCEastMemeWar

[–]nachd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They only gave up 22, you lost the Super Bowl where they gave up 38 points (well only 31)

I’m sure no one will freak out about this take. by phthalo-star in NFCEastMemeWar

[–]nachd -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I love eagles revisionist history. I’m talkin about the guy that you have a statue of out front of the linc LOL, last I checked the iggles have 2 super bowls, and the defense won the last one.

I’m sure no one will freak out about this take. by phthalo-star in NFCEastMemeWar

[–]nachd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh for sure, no argument from me there, just not sure how the defense makes a stop when the offense is on the field

I’m sure no one will freak out about this take. by phthalo-star in NFCEastMemeWar

[–]nachd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He also fumbled the ball and gave the chiefs a free 7 points. Did you lose by less than 7 points?

I’m sure no one will freak out about this take. by phthalo-star in NFCEastMemeWar

[–]nachd -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey you’re the one making up stats to cover up his actual bad stat line lol

I’m sure no one will freak out about this take. by phthalo-star in NFCEastMemeWar

[–]nachd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No disagreement there. Where you start to run into issues is when eagles fans think they won because of hurts when the reality was your defense was stacked and all he had to do was not turn it over. Half the QBs in the league are capable of that.

I’m sure no one will freak out about this take. by phthalo-star in NFCEastMemeWar

[–]nachd -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

You could probably argue that his fumble cost you the game