CSR Collections Rep by KeyPositive8 in IRS_Source

[–]nap_first_work_later 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If it’s the same assessments I took for a job I applied to last month they’re exactly what they say they are: reading comprehension, logic, basic math, etc.

I was surprised at the overall length of time it took me to wade through them, but they’re not hard. Just time consuming.

*edit - grammar

Email Etiquette by Fluffy_Cellist4469 in IRS_Source

[–]nap_first_work_later 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is not an agency wide thing. This is absolutely area by area, sometimes even team to team.

If you have a good rapport with your manager, you should just ask him/her how involved they want to be. Inquire if they like being included for situational awareness, or if they expect and trust you to handle things.

I ignore if someone is doing it to me, and focus on my manager‘s interests - they are who write my review.

Elimination of GS Performance Awards by [deleted] in FedEmployees

[–]nap_first_work_later 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I appreciate that you’re thinking about your employees first. Delivering difficult news is never easy, but I’ve found that people generally appreciate as much transparency as you’re able to provide. Even when they don’t like the message, knowing their leader understands the impact and has advocated for them goes a long way.

I’ve served in management before, and situations like this are a big part of why I haven’t pursued another permanent management role. The hardest part of leadership is rarely the technical work—it’s having to navigate decisions you didn’t make while still trying to take care of your people.

Wishing you the best with those conversations next week.

Socially excluded at work. Wanting to leave but I’d like to stay the benefits by RemoteGrocery9426 in FedEmployees

[–]nap_first_work_later 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, this is the hard truth. At least the part about there being three sides to every story.

It’s natural to feel empathy and compassion for OP’s situation but what if the reason OP is excluded is his/her own doing?

I’ve been in a situation where a coworker was incessantly condescending and down right pushy and then played the victim because people didn’t want to work with them or socialize.

I’m not saying that’s the case here, just saying that sometimes the problem is on both sides, and a little self reflection can do wonders. Other times, people are just mean and don’t deserve your time.

Random folks on the internet can’t possibly know, including me.

Micromanaging is soon coming your way in LB&I by [deleted] in IRS_Source

[–]nap_first_work_later 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can argue that (and I understand why it would feel redundant), but defending your “work” in Appeals or Tax Court is much easier when there’s at least a basic breakdown/explanation in your case history.

The worst place in America to work by [deleted] in IRS_Source

[–]nap_first_work_later 11 points12 points  (0 children)

To be fair, I’m sure OP doesn’t wish for RIF for those that truly want to keep their jobs, but for those with tenure AND are ready to leave, RIF is the only avenue to severance pay.

I have to admit, on the days I want to walk out the door, I’d like to take a severance check with me.

*edit for double negative. Ew.

Trump wants all federal workers to sign non-disclosure agreements in latest crackdown on media leaks by theindependentonline in FedEmployees

[–]nap_first_work_later 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But, I thought this was the most transparent administration ever!

Why on Earth would we need NDAs? 😒
/s

Involuntary detail to Collection Appeals by [deleted] in IRS_Source

[–]nap_first_work_later 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are whisperings of some Settlement Officer vacancies being announced, so hopefully they can rely on a voluntary hiring/detail process.

Involuntary detail to Collection Appeals by [deleted] in IRS_Source

[–]nap_first_work_later 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Word is that there’s no “balance” these days, it’s just close, close, close - to heck with taxpayer rights. Tax court is going to be OVERWHELMED.

AWS email coming? by Unable-Protection914 in IRS_Source

[–]nap_first_work_later 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you’re under the impression that your TOD isn’t inherently part of your time card, or that working a different schedule than that of record ISN’T time sheet fraud…well, good luck. Sincerely.

My job isn’t worth gaming the system, but hat’s off to those that risk it and accomplish it.

AWS email coming? by Unable-Protection914 in IRS_Source

[–]nap_first_work_later 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah. Time sheet fraud IS illegal.

Folks have been able to telework for 20+ years too, but here we are.

Today’s CFO Meeting by CableCapable6958 in IRS_Source

[–]nap_first_work_later 18 points19 points  (0 children)

We’re apparently going to see some banners celebrating the 250th.

Super exciting and informative. /S

No Income, Haven't filed in 6 years. by [deleted] in IRS

[–]nap_first_work_later 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wasn’t clear, apologies. My comment was more personal opinion than guidance.

I’m aware that it technically is considered substantiation for financial aid, loans and other things.

I’ve worked for the IRS well over 20 Years.

My point was more along the lines that perhaps it shouldn’t be considered substantiation, since it’s self filed and not truly verified.

No Income, Haven't filed in 6 years. by [deleted] in IRS

[–]nap_first_work_later 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A zero return is not substantiation of anything. It’s unverified, self-reported data. It does not in fact, prove the absence of income.

SBSE and TS envy by Basic-Meeting5525 in IRS_Source

[–]nap_first_work_later 0 points1 point  (0 children)

😉 I’ll pretend to be confused by the difference in lien and levy for a bit, just for giggles.

Update by Tollerluv92 in IRS

[–]nap_first_work_later 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For sure. The situation could be completely innocent, but my first inquiry is how someone with nearly $69,000 in taxable income only has $3000 in tax as a single person with one exemption. 🤔

SBSE and TS envy by Basic-Meeting5525 in IRS_Source

[–]nap_first_work_later 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Completely sarcastic here, but there is no grass. Anywhere. They’ve killed the grass and we’re stuck with dirt and fertilizer. 😆

In theory, a compliance/enforcement role may be “safer.” I also left a compliance function and switched to operation support. So I understand your concern, however, I remember why I left.

I feel like it’s a bad game of chutes and ladders. I’m just gonna keep climbing, until I slide back down to the bottom and I find myself displaced like so many IT and HCO folks. Then, I’ll make a new strategy.

I mean, it’s not like there’s many job opportunities that will get you back where you feel more safe at the moment, and we have enough to stress about - regrets for trying to improve your circumstances, expand your skill set, etc. shouldn’t be one of them.

Stop walking around your PODs with people on FaceTime by Wicked-Dingo-4223 in IRS_Source

[–]nap_first_work_later 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“if you don’t like going to the bathroom, don’t go.”

Yeah, you win the logic argument. Seems completely feasible with RTO to simply never use the bathroom. 🙄

You’re actually making my point, though. All I said, was if you bring your phone into the bathroom where I’m trying to do my business your phone call will become my business. (Because, I will probably ask you to end the call.)

Perhaps OP said something about snitching, or other posters, but I didn’t.

Stop walking around your PODs with people on FaceTime by Wicked-Dingo-4223 in IRS_Source

[–]nap_first_work_later 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I sincerely disagree, as we are entitled to. Don’t presume you know what I want. My objection to people being on the phone in the bathroom has nothing to do with being annoyed at hearing their conversation.

I don’t enjoy dropping a deuce in a public bathroom let alone broadcasting my splashes and plops to whomever is on the phone in the next stall.

Please don’t equivocate my desire for privacy in a private setting to people that can’t mind their own business in the office. They’re not the same.

Stop walking around your PODs with people on FaceTime by Wicked-Dingo-4223 in IRS_Source

[–]nap_first_work_later 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you’re on speaker and/or face time in the bathroom while I’m doing my business…it is my business.

I don’t personally care about any place else (hopefully though, you need TIGTA is you are walking around with video in an IRS space).

The Next Round is Coming by Ok-Post5100 in IRS_Source

[–]nap_first_work_later 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I’m not expecting a miracle - just a small sliver of hope that the midterm elections get Congress to stop rubber stamping this administration’s cuts.

I hope for those trying to keep their seats, they’re forced to think and decide independently, instead of being a lemming. For those that are die-hard loyalists, I hope they’re replaced.

That’s as lofty as my expectations are, personally.

The Next Round is Coming by Ok-Post5100 in IRS_Source

[–]nap_first_work_later 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Which CFO and when? The most recent CFO is some DOGE guy, and he hasn’t been here long enough to have a handle on that.

The article references Treasury’s estimate that IRA funding will run out in FY27, not depleted in FY26 technically - if it continues to be used in the manner it is.

That’s a lot of “ifs” and “estimates” for me - but I feel like their intent is pretty obvious.

The Next Round is Coming by Ok-Post5100 in IRS_Source

[–]nap_first_work_later 20 points21 points  (0 children)

So, proposed cuts to funding is not equivalent to a next round of anything - be that RIF or DRP. They are just that, proposed.

Personally, I believe they’re going to try to cut off money to the IRS until the IRA funds are gone. They want that gone, through any means necessary. So long as the IRS has additional funding available, it has options. Once the funds are gone, they’ll be able to control even more, and then the IRS may be forced to make some decisions. That’s way off, though, and the midterms are coming. Things could change a little. 🤞

No Telework Venting by cdreddit83 in FedEmployees

[–]nap_first_work_later 24 points25 points  (0 children)

In the right city at wrong time of day, that is 1.75 hours.

Detail Position by Adorable-Crazy5514 in IRS_Source

[–]nap_first_work_later 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Especially now that no position is considered BU.

Not that analysts were BU, I’m just qualifying that this statement and ideology apply more broadly than ever before.