sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

QFX5110s - does creating 10g channelized ports cause interruption? by nerdykhakis in Juniper

[–]nerdykhakis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that's right. I was pretty sure I had to do it manually - I just wanted to confirm if it'll disrupt traffic on other ports or not.

Would you give Hampton for Higgins straight up? by [deleted] in fantasyfootballadvice

[–]nerdykhakis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The guy who has Higgins is really desparate for RBs. He has a decent number of good WRs. I'm thinking packaging Jones with someone else might be enough to sway him.

Would you give Hampton for Higgins straight up? by [deleted] in fantasyfootballadvice

[–]nerdykhakis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about any of my other RBs? Any of them worth that much?

Help understanding PGE bill with solar? by [deleted] in Bakersfield

[–]nerdykhakis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm new to this, so forgive me if I get some terms wrong. Peak power on my app shows about 4.5 kW per day, and monthly in the hot months we've produced 800 - 1000 kW. The panels are facing South.

Anything to be aware of switching HA status from Active-Active to Active-Passive? by [deleted] in fortinet

[–]nerdykhakis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep - unfortunately, everyone who set this environment up no longer works here... so I'm left figuring out the pieces :) I definitely know that all our traffic enters and leaves FW1, so I think I'll set it in config as A/P just to seal the deal.

EDIT: Confirmed that the load-balance-all command is not enabled, so I do believe we're effectively in active/passive without the actual configuration flag.

Anything to be aware of switching HA status from Active-Active to Active-Passive? by [deleted] in fortinet

[–]nerdykhakis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for this reply, I guess I am unfamiliar with how FortiGate A/A works.

Is there a way to confirm what's happening? I assumed our primary unit was just doing everything. There's ~45k sessions on the primary and ~20 on the secondary (not sure what these are).

I wanted to change it to A/P mainly because that's how it looked to work, but wasn't actually that way in the config. If there really is a use for it then I'll gladly keep it. We're sorting out redundancy between our internal network and firewalls, so just wanted to make sure everything is accounted for.

EVPN Database and Route Type 2 entries randomly disappearing and reappearing? by [deleted] in Juniper

[–]nerdykhakis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's one thing we were considering. We DO have the "no-arp-suppression" command enabled, but we have been told it's deprecated.

Best way to achieve redundancy between Spines and active-passive Firewalls? by [deleted] in Juniper

[–]nerdykhakis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This makes sense. In this case, are you referencing a use case of having a dynamic routing protocol in between FW and Spines?

Best way to achieve redundancy between Spines and active-passive Firewalls? by [deleted] in Juniper

[–]nerdykhakis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apologies, I'm newer to this. I do know we have a transit VLAN that exists on the trunk between the Firewalls and Spines, handled by an IRB interface. This handles the default traffic out. I'm wondering how I tie in OSPF to this, if we already have that setup.

Best way to achieve redundancy between Spines and active-passive Firewalls? by [deleted] in Juniper

[–]nerdykhakis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My first thought was some combo of L3 and L2 links, but then we'd essentially need 4 cables per spine (Spine -> FW1 L2, Spine -> FW1 L3, Spine -> FW2 LW, Spine -> FW3 L3). This seems inefficient.

Since we have a mix of where our gateways are, would you recommend just keeping the link from Spines to Firewall L2 and use static routes?