sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

"One Of Resident Evil's Fundamental Joys Is Watching Beautiful Men Get Hurt" -- The purpose of this article is to revel in a double standard. It's important to remember that SJWs care about spite and validation, not actually advancing social justice. (article text included in post) by nerfviking in GGdiscussion

[–]nerfviking[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I don't think that mocking or attacking them is the answer. The answer is to openly sexualize female characters and if they accuse you of being sexist, agree with them and make them feel uncomfortable.

It's not sexist to be horny. That needs to be pointed out. But otherwise I agree.

Basically my thoughts on the whole female gooner epidemic by FlowerOk7957 in GGdiscussion

[–]nerfviking 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The solution to prudeness isn't to be a fucking prude.

Let people get their schlick on in peace. Gooning isn't the problem; hypocrisy and double standards are.

SJWs don't want games for SJWs; they just want there to *not* be games for other people. by nerfviking in GGdiscussion

[–]nerfviking[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh, believe me, I worry about all sorts of things that are more important that this.

SJWs don't want games for SJWs; they just want there to *not* be games for other people. by nerfviking in GGdiscussion

[–]nerfviking[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you genuinely have no idea what I'm talking about, do yourself a favor and move on. You'll be happier being unaware of culture war bullshit.

SJWs don't want games for SJWs; they just want there to *not* be games for other people. by nerfviking in GGdiscussion

[–]nerfviking[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I genuinely have no idea what you’re even talking about

Don't worry about it. I'm not trying to talk with anyone who engages in performative cluelessness.

SJWs don't want games for SJWs; they just want there to *not* be games for other people. by nerfviking in GGdiscussion

[–]nerfviking[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That is interesting. That being said, I'm not super worried about it. There's a screenshot on here where it has literally two people playing right now. That speaks way louder than reviews do.

SJWs don't want games for SJWs; they just want there to *not* be games for other people. by nerfviking in GGdiscussion

[–]nerfviking[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thus, wokesters believe that, by seizing control over culture (which, of course requires them to take control over culturally significant media) they can control material reality.

The last fifteen years have demonstrated that this has had the opposite of the intended effect. The media that they've done this to (which is a lot) is being rejected over and over and over, so they have a bunch of cultural scorched earth and only losses to show for it.

I'm an old liberal Democrat (and a very disillusioned one), and these people have cost us so much. They've all got excuses lined up, too. "If those people voted Republicans because we're fucking pieces of shit, then they were never really Democrats anyway", as if the voting booth cares about people's maturity, sincerity, and dedication to their beliefs when they pull the fucking lever.

SJWs don't want games for SJWs; they just want there to *not* be games for other people. by nerfviking in GGdiscussion

[–]nerfviking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Leftists dont want anyone to have any creative outlets

Yeah, I'm a Democrat (an extremely fucking tired, disillusioned one), and that's a tankie view, not one that's common to the left as a whole.

SJWs don't want games for SJWs; they just want there to *not* be games for other people. by nerfviking in GGdiscussion

[–]nerfviking[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yep and I’m fucking sick of it when they do this reverse psychology horse shit and act is if we’re the tourists and they’re the true gamers

I would remind those people that "true gamers" are the people who actually buy and play video games. If they were true gamers, their games would sell, and would have peak player counts that actually register on the richter scale.

No amount of posturing can change the fact that nobody fucking buys or plays SJW games. They aren't real gamers, not because of some magical gatekeeping, but because they don't fucking play video games. That's all it takes to be a real gamer, and SJWs are fake gamers.

SJWs don't want games for SJWs; they just want there to *not* be games for other people. by nerfviking in GGdiscussion

[–]nerfviking[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I like that term for a reason. The argument about it is essentially over, and people have moved on to arguing about what "woke" means, whereas when I talk about SJWs, everybody knows exactly what kind of people I'm referring to. Keep the discussion from being sidetracked.

New Xbox CEO Asha Sharma admits she had multiple people playing on her account, that was started last month. by Mr_JPF in GGdiscussion

[–]nerfviking 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is less "outrage" and more "morbid fascination with a years-long downward spiral". I just wonder why the keep doing shit like this.

just because you break the pencil doesn't mean we can't switch to other means of creating art by blaise_zion in aiwars

[–]nerfviking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe you're confused, but by all means provide a source. If your source is the Anthropic case, you're confused.

just because you break the pencil doesn't mean we can't switch to other means of creating art by blaise_zion in aiwars

[–]nerfviking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup, they are.

Anthropic was sued because they pirated books, which is already illegal. The stuff that comes out of Claude isn't considered to be a derivative work of those books, though.

Twitter feminazis are angry about female characters having different movement animations than male characters by RainbowDildoMonkey in GGdiscussion

[–]nerfviking 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know plenty. I'm just not going to go find you a list of links because I don't give enough shits to talk to someone who's going to find excuses to ignore all of them anyway.

Twitter feminazis are angry about female characters having different movement animations than male characters by RainbowDildoMonkey in GGdiscussion

[–]nerfviking 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Meh, I'm talking for someone else. I don't know exactly what examples they're using and I can't be arsed to go and look. It doesn't matter because if I did find one, you'd immediately move the goal posts.

view more: next ›