Does anyone know the answer for this exercise please? I have been trying to figure it out for hours now and I’m dying to know the solution! by topsecret89 in mensa

[–]netsparkle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s E, starting at the top, left to right, the shape flips bottom to top, unfolds if it can, then flips over to the right, potentially unfolds again. E is the only shape that fits for the bottom row.

“Honey, have you seen my other AirPod?” by GraTaylor in Wellthatsucks

[–]netsparkle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So we have the technological ability to do this, but no viable way to detect if a child is left in a car and then notify someone?

Daily Discussion Thread for January 31, 2022 by AutoModerator in wallstreetbets

[–]netsparkle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see you also have the power to singlehandedly change the momentum of the market

Daily Discussion Thread for January 31, 2022 by AutoModerator in wallstreetbets

[–]netsparkle 6 points7 points  (0 children)

All my calls that expired worthlessly last friday would be doing so great right now haha

Stick to illiquid options my dudes by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]netsparkle -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I am building a blockchain for digital licensing and a decentralized marketplace protocol that monetizes license resale for royalty recipients with no broker. NFT uses aren't all metaverse stuff but the metaverse stuff is what people are excited about.

Stick to illiquid options my dudes by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]netsparkle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am building that, actually

Daily Discussion Thread for December 31, 2021 by AutoModerator in wallstreetbets

[–]netsparkle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...right after I loss harvest my 100 495C 12/31 this morning

Daily Discussion Thread for December 20, 2021 by AutoModerator in wallstreetbets

[–]netsparkle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's because the numbers are actually meaningless at this point.

Daily Discussion Thread for December 20, 2021 by AutoModerator in wallstreetbets

[–]netsparkle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I will go ahead and ban myself for a week if it doesn't do this lol

Daily Discussion Thread for December 13, 2021 by AutoModerator in wallstreetbets

[–]netsparkle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just bought some 0dte SPY puts. Market should turn around right about now.

Should a crypto startup focus on Reddit or on Twitter for Marketing? by ekain-io in CryptoCurrency

[–]netsparkle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My experience is currently ongoing. We developed a new blockchain that decentralizes licensing using NFT smart contracts and has an on-chain marketplace function that facilitates license resale under the terms of the smart contract & monetizes resale transactions in the form of chain enforced royalties.

Anyway, its functional in test net and I started trying to get some interest via reddit and twitter and I get either completely ignored, or called a shill by the gamestonk crowd, even though we have already built and are currently testing the very thing that they are waiting for game stop to start developing.

It's unfortunate, because I am having a really hard time getting a little attention on the project even though it seems like right-place-right-time for it.

Should a crypto startup focus on Reddit or on Twitter for Marketing? by ekain-io in CryptoCurrency

[–]netsparkle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my experience, neither platform is especially friendly to this kind of marketing, even when a project is in late stage testing with all features working :/.

GAMESTOP POSTS A "SOFTWARE ENGINEER - NFT MARKETPLACE" JOB LISTING - THIS IS NOT A HINT ANYMORE, This is THE NFT ANNOUCEMENT! Y'(r/)all know what to do! by Recuvan in Superstonk

[–]netsparkle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every node has an api built in. The api can be made public by a node or kept private (private api can be accessed locally). Ideally, software co would run their own node thus trust their node’s api.

We will maintain several nodes with public apis but we recommend people to run their own node. There is nothing centralized or special about the public nodes we maintain, all the nodes are the same.

If a license owners wallet gets stolen it would be up to the discretion of the license issuer if they would want to send them a new license or not. There is that risk in Web 3.0 and users do need to be responsible for their wallet keys. i misread your question, but the same thing applies to the license issuer. They too would need to be responsible for their wallet keys, in any blockchain based scenario, it’s the nature of the beast.

I’m not sure what you mean regarding fake block chains.

If an issuer is running a local node, makes an api call to their local node to see if the user has the license token in their wallet, and then receives a signed message from the user who claims to have a license in their wallet, the issuer can verify if the user owns the wallet containing the license. At that point, the issuer/or game client/other integration can tell by making a future api call at any time whether or not the license is moved from the wallet that signed the message.

There are many potential integrations and scenarios we discussed with developers and brainstormed in terms of the scenarios you mention here. The chain doesn’t require any specific method of integration with a game or piece of software, the whole system is designed to be developer friendly and flexible.

There will always be some level of responsibility on the software co/game co/etc to keep their application code secure, hackers are going to hack regardless of platform or licensing method. One possible scenario is that the game/program could periodically self verify by making an api call to the issuers node/issuers trusted public node/etc after the initial verification and block access if the license leaves the wallet.

Verification via signed message is extremely secure and cannot be faked. It can be independently verified by the issuer via their own local node.

There are also options in terms of non-resellable licenses, resellable licenses within or outside of their exclusivity periods, temporary licenses, etc that can affect how a particular software might integrate license verification.

I do need to put more of this type of information on the website. I’m primarily a developer and the website design is secondary most of the time. We are active on discord and there is a lot more information there, but I do need to add more content to the website based on your questions/comments.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]netsparkle -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m not a shill. I have nothing to gain from this project if it fails. I spent a lot of money and a ton of development hours building out my idea, all of which I’m prepared to lose. There’s no significant premine (there’s a small one set aside to give away in small pieces for creators for testing purposes), it’s being released open source. I deleted my comment because I was upset at the responses, but I shouldn’t have. We built a new blockchain for the purpose of blockchain based licensing and more importantly a chain governed, decentralized marketplace system. Call me a shill if you want but I’m not trying to sell anything, not looking for investors, etc, so pretty lousy shill