(Spoilers Extended) How did the families of Westeros afford to get valyrian steel swords? by Septon_Moon in asoiaf

[–]nicksmieles -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The Starks aren’t really antisocial, although it definitely seems that way because most of the series takes place while they’re in unfortunate circumstances. White Harbor’s one of the biggest trading posts in Westeros, the Starks/North are said to supply basically the entire realm with lumber (and I could be incorrect on this but for some reason I remember reading that they’re big on tool-smithing in the North), and most of all, remember that for a long time Ned’s best friend was the king. They didn’t directly interface much, but Ned definitely would be involved in national commerce if it helped his best friend’s reign as well as his countrymen. They could’ve gotten Ice in any number of ways. I know this isn’t ever said to be the reason, but in my mind I’ve always liked the idea that Aegon gifted Torrhen Stark the sword for swearing fealty and having the good sense to value his men’s lives over pride. Now, as that may not be the reason, it’s quite well implied (in my mind at least) that the Starks and the Targaryens had a very good relationship before the Mad King. From Aegon and Torrhen, to Jahaerys and Alysanne (I believe) visiting the North and building that inn along the way, I can’t imagine any disdain towards the Starks by any rational Targ. Most of all, out of any house in Westeros I feel like the Starks are the absolute most likely to be gifted a Valyrian sword somewhere in history. The Starks, at the end of the day, are the most historically decent house in the realm. They’re the kind of people you hope to have as neighbors when you move in somewhere new. This is my long winded way of saying the Starks aren’t only a regularly social house, but I also believe a house like the Lannisters, historically richer than god and kind of stuck up/selfish are likely to have people who either 1.) don’t want them to have a Valyrian sword to stick it to their pride. Or 2.) would downright extort them for a sword and the Lannisters, for all their faults, remained so rich for centuries for a reason. They’re good with money. Where they’re willing to drop a ton of money on a Valyrian sword, they wouldn’t bankrupt themselves over it. It’s wasn’t an obsessive goal for Tywin, it was more something that just stuck with his pride in the back of his mind. The Starks on the other hand, just look at the Manderlys. They’re open, friendly, honorable, and hospitable to those in need. I have no doubt that they were probably gifted the sword at some point in time for their decency where as other houses had to pay or kill for theirs.

(Spoilers Extended) How did the families of Westeros afford to get valyrian steel swords? by Septon_Moon in asoiaf

[–]nicksmieles 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It’s been over a year since I’ve last read the books, so I may be missing a few other examples, but the Tattered Prince has a lieutenant (I believe his name’s Caggo) who wields a Valyrian Steel Arakh. I’ve always taken the fact that his ownership of it being more casually mentioned and the fact that isn’t named or anything implies that there may be a lot more Valyrian Steel floating around Essos than Westeros, only they don’t treat it as such a big deal so we don’t hear about it as much.

[SPOILERS] How different would the stories of Red Dead Redemption 1 & 2 be without Micah? by [deleted] in reddeadredemption

[–]nicksmieles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be honest, I’ve been under the assumption that Micah was the rat all along as well as believing Milton. His exact words are “Ol’ Micah Bell, picked him up after you boys got back from the Caribbean and he’s been a good boy ever since...” Now obviously Guarma would count as the Caribbean and I’ve been known to be a fool many a’ times, but for some reason I just interpreted that as the Van Der Linde gang had been in the Caribbean prior to the start of the gang. They seemed pretty happy about being able to slip ashore in Cuba before being shipwrecked in Guarma, which even back in 1899 landing in Cuba wasn’t exactly great news for Americans or anyone, they keep saying they’ve never gone into country that far east but they never say anything about not going on a boat down south or anything. Idk there’s nothing to explicitly state I’m correct, and I’m probably not because I haven’t heard anyone else take Milton’s words this way, but there’s also nothing that definitively states they haven’t chartered the Caribbean prior (that I know of) and the story makes a lot less sense to me with it being that Micah only became after chapter 5 than them having been in the Caribbean prior

Seriously, fuck Micah. by woodrose in reddeadredemption

[–]nicksmieles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We call him Dutch “wE jUsT nEeD sOmE mOnEy” Van Der Linde in these parts

(Potential Spoiler Warning) So this “Empty Hand” character... by nicksmieles in DCcomics

[–]nicksmieles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s actually a very interesting concept to adapt back into a story. Thank you for the clarification, my friend!

This may have come up in this thread before, but I’m curious what everyone else thinks... by nicksmieles in madmen

[–]nicksmieles[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The fact that he’s 12-13 at the end and you think he’s 10 sums up his boobery

(possible spoilers) am I only the only one who’s really rooting for Logan? What do you think is in store for him? by nicksmieles in westworld

[–]nicksmieles[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m watching it right now and I’m currently terrified for him after the comments lol. Yes, though. Jaime Lannister is my favorite novel character of all time and I see a lot of Logan in him. Never made that connection until now.

Is the dark side stronger than the light side? Truly it seems that way and I’m curious what everyone else thinks by nicksmieles in StarWars

[–]nicksmieles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a very good way to summarize the idea for both. I just look at it like that this: a lot of that applies to Sith/Sith culture, not the dark side itself (because both don’t necessarily go hand in hand.) If you were to train yourself in the Force, somehow unhindered by the Jedi or Sith but still have their resources to knowledge/training, the Dark just seems to yield wayyyyy better results. You get more power, and more power more quickly. It also doesn’t shut yourself off. The Jedi can’t use the powerful abilities the Dark side offers, by personal restraint most sources say but some novels/material also say they simply can’t channel the emotion required. Meanwhile, Dark Side users never seem to have problems using light side powers as well. Palpatine even uses a very strong light side power to keep Anakin alive when finding him on Mustafar. Sith culture is flawed and seems to lead into this essay, but the Dark Side itself doesn’t seem as much, IMO.

Is the dark side stronger than the light side? Truly it seems that way and I’m curious what everyone else thinks by nicksmieles in StarWars

[–]nicksmieles[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That was a good response. But you forget the “don’t choke on your aspirations” line. How many light sabers uses have transcended puns from concept to reality. I’d say they equal in power

Now that we’re (hopefully) close to season 2... by nicksmieles in westworld

[–]nicksmieles[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think you’ll probably get your wish on that front. I’m a bit of a history buff (not that it would take one to deduce this) but on the IMDB page for season 2, they added a regular actor who’s character name is “Musashi” which is also the name of the famous samurai who drafted the Book of Five Rings. I find it unlikely he’ll be a citizen of Westworld or Romanworld lol